- May 28, 2017
- 238
- 371
I can't say I've gone into much depth but I did give the first few pages a looking.
The positives for me:
- You have a clear premise that indeed seems to have relatively little 'second verse same as the first' feel to it.
- You also clearly thought through the motivations and relations.
The negatives (again, just my opinion, so you are free to ignore it):
- You are oversharing from a VN POV. I understand that if you want me to visualize an 18yo that's short and skinny with little breasts you need to feed me the datapoints, but understanding this story will be aided by visuals it's really killing me to get so much data. You know your girls, you've written their stories, planned their lives, you visualized them yourself. If I see a short and skinny girl on screen and read 'this is your sister Evelyn, she recently turned 18 (not that she could be motivated to celebrate it, the apathetic ghost)' I look at the visuals and check if she looks 18 and unmotivated. My point is, you need to know a lot more about the girls to write a coherent story than the reader needs to appreciate the story. [This whole point is mostly about page 1].
- I personally really lose immersion when you use too many nametags. What I mean with that, I know she's my mom, she knows I'm her son. It doesn't feel natural for there to be a 'but my son' or 'OK mom, ...' in so many lines of dialogue. That's not even considering you will probably be showing in the header of the Ren'py textbox who is speaking.
I hope that was respectful and polite enough, I legit intend no offense. The reason I write a lot more for the negatives is because constructive criticism just takes more explanation. I weigh the positives heavier than the negatives (easy enough to fix, you've learned coding, you know all about squelching redundancies) but 'this is good, I like this' just takes far less explanation.
EDIT: I just saw disclaimer A, so I don't know exactly how much validity there is to my negative points. Although I still think it holds true, you acknowledged that it's not written as if VN yet.
The positives for me:
- You have a clear premise that indeed seems to have relatively little 'second verse same as the first' feel to it.
- You also clearly thought through the motivations and relations.
The negatives (again, just my opinion, so you are free to ignore it):
- You are oversharing from a VN POV. I understand that if you want me to visualize an 18yo that's short and skinny with little breasts you need to feed me the datapoints, but understanding this story will be aided by visuals it's really killing me to get so much data. You know your girls, you've written their stories, planned their lives, you visualized them yourself. If I see a short and skinny girl on screen and read 'this is your sister Evelyn, she recently turned 18 (not that she could be motivated to celebrate it, the apathetic ghost)' I look at the visuals and check if she looks 18 and unmotivated. My point is, you need to know a lot more about the girls to write a coherent story than the reader needs to appreciate the story. [This whole point is mostly about page 1].
- I personally really lose immersion when you use too many nametags. What I mean with that, I know she's my mom, she knows I'm her son. It doesn't feel natural for there to be a 'but my son' or 'OK mom, ...' in so many lines of dialogue. That's not even considering you will probably be showing in the header of the Ren'py textbox who is speaking.
I hope that was respectful and polite enough, I legit intend no offense. The reason I write a lot more for the negatives is because constructive criticism just takes more explanation. I weigh the positives heavier than the negatives (easy enough to fix, you've learned coding, you know all about squelching redundancies) but 'this is good, I like this' just takes far less explanation.
EDIT: I just saw disclaimer A, so I don't know exactly how much validity there is to my negative points. Although I still think it holds true, you acknowledged that it's not written as if VN yet.