VN Ren'Py Mila AI [v1.4.1public] [aDDont]

4.20 star(s) 105 Votes
Discussion Reviews (105)
swiver

swiver

Active Member
Sep 13, 2020
632
585
Everyone forget my shit post!

Dealbreaker said:
I have to respectfully disagree here. Why is it so hard to admit that she is, in fact, humiliating him by this very act and he is participating and accepting it? I think we tend to deny this in order to preserve a pure idea of love which can't be disturbed by humiliation. But instead, i think we have to acknowledge the central role of power and possession here. If you speak of reclaiming her then you also have to recognize, that she annulled his claim just before by giving herself to another guy. Or we have to drop this language once and for all and pretend sex has nothing to do with possession. Possession is by definition exclusive in this context. she is NOT very much his after that, these are mere formulas couples find to get over this. She is not a car you can lend and bring back. And he is very much not a pimp to lend her out. One cannot have both, claiming, that she is exploring HER sexuality, that she is engaging in HER fantasies and not seeing that she is acting on her own behalf. Him allowing it doesn't change that. And regarding power: there is a rearrangement of roles here, in your interpretation you are describing him doing something for her, for her activities. Being thankful for that is not the same as being committed, it is not the same, the play has shifted. What she does for herself, she doesn't do for both of them, what she gives the other guy she takes from him, these are the hard truths in monogamous relationships. A heterosexual man cleaning her from an other guy is feeling humiliation in this moment and she knows that. He has to overcome a natural repulsion and doing that is humiliating, and this is the very fact which arouses him in that moment, not the sperm itself of course. And using this act in order to absolve herself from feelings of shame uses him as an instrument for that. That Mila feels that way as in the game I find totally understandble from her perspective, she wants to be absolved, she wants to be accepted, she want the contradictions reconciled. But we as observer can't do the same and be honest at the same time.

One cannot just draw a line here according to one's own subjective preferences. Why is it "crazy" to tolerate a pregnancy from another guy, but it is okay to lick his semen? This is an arbitrary line. One could argue she is also "his" with this child if she says so.

This idea, that a couple can do that and have the same kind of love seems to me a utopia of people (I speak generally here, as one can find this in all kinds of threads here) who want their kink but not the inevitable consequences. Some men want to sense the intensity of the play of power and possession but have love like before anyway, totally abstract, above the flesh so to speak. Another question could be if there is another kind of love which is compatible with humiliation, but it is not the love they had before. Games show their quality (as this one) when they don't try to disguise or cover that but bring it in the open.
Click to expand...
 
  • Haha
  • Heart
Reactions: NeonMordor and Dealbreaker
aDDont

aDDont

Developer of Mila AI
Game Developer
Apr 20, 2020
359
2,426
Dealbreaker said:
I have to respectfully disagree here. Why is it so hard to admit that she is, in fact, humiliating him by this very act and he is participating and accepting it? I think we tend to deny this in order to preserve a pure idea of love which can't be disturbed by humiliation. But instead, i think we have to acknowledge the central role of power and possession here. If you speak of reclaiming her then you also have to recognize, that she annulled his claim just before by giving herself to another guy. Or we have to drop this language once and for all and pretend sex has nothing to do with possession. Possession is by definition exclusive in this context. she is NOT very much his after that, these are mere formulas couples find to get over this. She is not a car you can lend and bring back. And he is very much not a pimp to lend her out. One cannot have both, claiming, that she is exploring HER sexuality, that she is engaging in HER fantasies and not seeing that she is acting on her own behalf. Him allowing it doesn't change that. And regarding power: there is a rearrangement of roles here, in your interpretation you are describing him doing something for her, for her activities. Being thankful for that is not the same as being committed, it is not the same, the play has shifted. What she does for herself, she doesn't do for both of them, what she gives the other guy she takes from him, these are the hard truths in monogamous relationships. A heterosexual man cleaning her from an other guy is feeling humiliation in this moment and she knows that. He has to overcome a natural repulsion and doing that is humiliating, and this is the very fact which arouses him in that moment, not the sperm itself of course. And using this act in order to absolve herself from feelings of shame uses him as an instrument for that. That Mila feels that way as in the game I find totally understandble from her perspective, she wants to be absolved, she wants to be accepted, she want the contradictions reconciled. But we as observer can't do the same and be honest at the same time.

One cannot just draw a line here according to one's own subjective preferences. Why is it "crazy" to tolerate a pregnancy from another guy, but it is okay to lick his semen? This is an arbitrary line. One could argue she is also "his" with this child if she says so.

This idea, that a couple can do that and have the same kind of love seems to me a utopia of people (I speak generally here, as one can find this in all kinds of threads here) who want their kink but not the inevitable consequences. Some men want to sense the intensity of the play of power and possession but have love like before anyway, totally abstract, above the flesh so to speak. Another question could be if there is another kind of love which is compatible with humiliation, but it is not the love they had before. Games show their quality (as this one) when they don't try to disguise or cover that but bring it in the open.
Click to expand...
Well, my stance here is this: humiliation doesn’t matter. Humiliation is an interpretation of Mila’s actions from Paul’s perspective. He may feel humiliated or not, but making him feel that way was not Mila’s intention. Her actions are rooted in her insecurity about his love and her need for connection. She understands that what she did might hurt him (or has hurt him), she’s afraid of losing him, and she wants to feel loved. On top of that, she wants to share the responsibility for what happened. It’s a combination of emotions like that.

From there, it’s open to interpretation—Paul might feel humiliated and might love it. Maybe both. He might not feel humiliated at all because he’s focused on her emotions. It heavily depends on the person.

I don’t plan to escalate this situation to the point of "balls crushing", because that’s not my interpretation of love or power dynamics in a relationship. I want to leave the impression that they love, respect, and care for each other, and that they’re exploring new boundaries and discovering new things to make them both feel more alive and happy.
rockstarporno69 said:
When will the update release?
Click to expand...
Somewhere in february (maybe even march). I'll release public version when the BBC route will be finished.
 
  • Heart
  • Like
  • Thinking Face
Reactions: beoroa21123, telly1712, hooter and 4 others
hello.jpg

hello.jpg

Member
Nov 7, 2017
190
335
aDDont said:
I want to start making it right after the BBC route. I think I'll add love triangle there (Mila, her sister and Paul) and probably there will be a harem like route, but I am not sure. Another idea is to make it loyal from both sides, and add bdsm, public plays, watersport etc. Maybe they will grow from codependency to actual "grown-up" type of love, with more respect and wisdom in their relationship. Still thinking about that. What's certain it won't be instand "happy ending" scene, there will be another story there.
Click to expand...
Let's fucking go fam. Can't wait for that route.

Silwith said:
And here am I, wanting to see Mila get used as an urinal... :devilish::ROFLMAO:
I don't judge kinky XD
Click to expand...
1737821997246.png
 
  • Jizzed my pants
  • Haha
Reactions: Pr0GamerJohnny and aDDont
X

Xvhfhhbvss

Newbie
Mar 19, 2024
39
18
aDDont said:
Well, my stance here is this: humiliation doesn’t matter. Humiliation is an interpretation of Mila’s actions from Paul’s perspective. He may feel humiliated or not, but making him feel that way was not Mila’s intention. Her actions are rooted in her insecurity about his love and her need for connection. She understands that what she did might hurt him (or has hurt him), she’s afraid of losing him, and she wants to feel loved. On top of that, she wants to share the responsibility for what happened. It’s a combination of emotions like that.

From there, it’s open to interpretation—Paul might feel humiliated and might love it. Maybe both. He might not feel humiliated at all because he’s focused on her emotions. It heavily depends on the person.

I don’t plan to escalate this situation to the point of "balls crushing", because that’s not my interpretation of love or power dynamics in a relationship. I want to leave the impression that they love, respect, and care for each other, and that they’re exploring new boundaries and discovering new things to make them both feel more alive and happy.

Somewhere in february (maybe even march). I'll release public version when the BBC route will be finished.
Click to expand...
Great, may I ask if there will be a pegging?


跟读
 
  • Like
Reactions: Princess Groundhog
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
4.20 star(s) 105 Votes