And if a guy lays down and uses magic mind control to make a girl bounce on his cock, it's also male sub huh?
Temptation is temptation regardless of whether or not it's stupid magic mumbo jumbo or not.
It's just an abstraction of feelings, and you can resist it at every point in her encounter.
So yeah, if you're trying to nitpick my example then, if he's blowing out magic pheremones but the woman doesn't want to in my scenario she can resist and leave. He has no control cause he's purposefully taking the submissive role and wants the woman to take the dominant one.
In fact, even if the magic pheremones or suggestion or wtv shit is just fully unresistable, you still have the option of just relieving yourself instead of jumping at the nearest pussy if you care about the emotional impact you'd have.
Personally I think it's ludicrous to take agency away from subs. If they want their partner to lead that's fine. It doesn't make them a dom to lead their partner into leading.
"Turns out"? No, it's made completely obvious beforehand. You'd have to be a total moron to not realise that she is compelling him to do it all along.
I mean of course with the context clues you can tell she's doing something to you, but depending on how you've progressed her dialogue you can't know exactly what. That scene is proof of her suggestive abilities.
It's written in a way where it's a scene where you "take advantage of her" but "not really" because of the underlying context.
That's why I gave it the asterisk whenever I mentioned it.
