No, it's debunked by the game itself, which is the reason the post you're responding to hadThis is quite correct.
No, it's debunked by the game itself, which is the reason the post you're responding to hadThis is quite correct.
Right, but now you're also just presuming those things prove your view aren't you which is what you don't seem to want to grasp here.The mistake you're making here is presuming that these instances somehow prove that Perry cares only about his own interest and can't be genuinely concerned about his friend, or consider their shared activities as something he believes to be best for Wade: that is, doing things he knows Wade enjoys, vs putting up with girlfriend who only vexes Wade with her demands.
I'm so happy for Andrea9999 and mommysboiii. Don't know how Ser Hawkes is gonna feel about the update.Did you play the update yet?
Theres a big Seymour spoiler you are missing.
That is quite understandable if you play the game a couple times to see most of the things happening and how the various characters are.There are so many terrible characters in the game, main villain is not part of the who is the worst discussion.![]()
I think we're going in circles at this point. My stance is that given the lack of proof for Perry's supposed complete selfishness it's reasonable to believe his apparent concern for his friend is at least partially genuine. What you consider to be my presumption is what we can actually see in the game, vs your presumption (Perry's complete selfishness) which we can't observe.Right, but now you're also just presuming those things prove your view aren't you which is what you don't seem to want to grasp here.
Did you play the update yet?
Theres a big Seymour spoiler you are missing.
Xupu: I was just joking. I did not play the update yet. Before I noticed the update I coincidentally started a new game with URM to try and get the Ian cuckold route. Thank you for telling me there is a Seymour update without spoiling it....though i am getting a hint it is not what I am hoping for.No, it's debunked by the game itself, which is the reason the post you're responding to hadin the spoiler.
Now I am curious....but school rears its head...I am behind....it will have to wait until the end of the week.
If your curiosity gets the better of you: Seymour is requesting Lena to join him on a few days long business trip, next week in the game. I've joked earlier that it'd be obviously trip to Dubai.Now I am curious....but school rears its head...I am behind....it will have to wait until the end of the week.
Lol, so now you've gone from acknowledging the scenes I mentioned but having your own view on them to now simply denying they exist because you effectively don't want to acknowledge you're inferring just as much as I am but with a different end result.I think we're going in circles at this point. My stance is that given the lack of proof for Perry's supposed complete selfishness it's reasonable to believe his apparent concern for his friend is at least partially genuine. What you consider to be my presumption is what we can actually see in the game, vs your presumption (Perry's complete selfishness) which we can't observe.
At the risk of invoking a meme "we're not the same".
Actually, the majority of writers on wattpad are young girls hence the cringe writing.I guess you never heard about wattpad or such apps? Characters like Axel and Seymour will look like saints if you compare them to characters in those books and mind you, majority of writers in there are women.
I'm very happy to agree to disagree, one of my bugbears though is when people go "we'll agree to disagree... but you're wrong and I'm right".Guys...ffs...just agree to disagree and drop it eh?
Wishful thinking, my man. But in any case "next week" means Chapter 13, i.e. release not this year.If your curiosity gets the better of you: Seymour is requesting Lena to join him on a few days long business trip, next week in the game. I've joked earlier that it'd be obviously trip to Dubai.
Can't it be both?. Most times people have more than one motivation behind their behaviour. I agree with Perry being sincerely relieved about Wade not having remaining issues from a bad trip. That's not even specially selfless, it's quite the standard reaction unless you really hate the other guy or you're a sociopath. And probably he is also happy for more selfish reasons, both can be true.I think we're going in circles at this point. My stance is that given the lack of proof for Perry's supposed complete selfishness it's reasonable to believe his apparent concern for his friend is at least partially genuine. What you consider to be my presumption is what we can actually see in the game, vs your presumption (Perry's complete selfishness) which we can't observe.
At the risk of invoking a meme "we're not the same".
He preserves the meager Ivy content and is currently hibernating until the next update.Don't know how Ser Hawkes is gonna feel about the update.
Chapter 13 we might actually get IvyXIan. It's just it might release 2026Wishful thinking, my man. But in any case "next week" means Chapter 13, i.e. release not this year.
Yes, obviously, which is why i said "it's reasonable to believe his apparent concern for his friend is at least partially genuine." Meaning it could well be a combination of two sentiments, as opposed to being entirely selfish.Can't it be both?. Most times people have more than one motivation behind their behaviour.
thanks found it.RedString-1574621830
it's easiest to sort by "date modified" with most recent on top. Then it'll be right on top after you play it.
No...no...I am doing it just for kicks...not as a career.Andrea is playing the loser cuck route,is over bros pack it up.
We lost her.