I don't care about Seymour route, I just want the fixes for the bugs from 12.3.
That just means Jeremy is also not dogmatic but an open-minded and reasonable person who can be swayed by good argumentI think it's rather feeble myself. Props for at least putting on a token resistance I guess, but that Lena can tempt him to break it anyway just makes him appear pathetic to me.
Yes, to me it'd show him in the same light as Perry, little cranky sourpuss constantly kvetching bro code this and bro code that, so i don't think this would be change for the better. :vIf he could reject her wholly in that scene, regardless of what the player does, I think that'd really show him in a different light, even if Lena could later on in the story "bludgeon" him into sexual surrender![]()
It shouldn't. I have no issue with the player having the option to go after him and continuing to do so. I'd even find him more enticing to chase myself if he couldn't fold the very first time you try.I guess i just don't treat seriously enough the whole idea that "i saw her and i like her so she's miiiiine" should totally override girl's own agency and willingness to pick partner(s) that she wants.
I would agree, but the bro-code is one Jeremy claims to abide by himself. If he didn't make the big speech about it first I wouldn't blame him for failing to uphold it either.So if Jeremy doesn't make that the core of his personality, then honestly, good for him. Frankly, the idea of "claiming" a girl because dude just likes her is pretty fucking creepy. Like, i get the emotional aspect, but Ian, dude, come on.
I don't think I understand what you are arguing here, can you explain?Yes, to me it'd show him in the same light as Perry, little cranky sourpuss constantly kvetching bro code this and bro code that, so i don't think this would be change for the better. :v
I disagree with this. If a friend says he has romantic feelings for someone then it should be understood that that someone is off limits. If it's not romantic, like how Jeremy talks up Ivy, then it's different. I don't think it's removing the person agency, it's just using your own agency to not be the person that slept with a friend's crush/romantic prospect, if the person then wants to still use their agency to see other people who are not your friend, they can do that, but you don't have to be involved with that. Also, it takes quite a while for Jeremy to come clean, even if he does clearly feel guilty about it.I guess i just don't treat seriously enough the whole idea that "i saw her and i like her so she's miiiiine" should totally override girl's own agency and willingness to pick partner(s) that she wants. So if Jeremy doesn't make that the core of his personality, then honestly, good for him. Frankly, the idea of "claiming" a girl because dude just likes her is pretty fucking creepy. Like, i get the emotional aspect, but Ian, dude, come on.
Well Arthur is there it seems, so close enoughI'm only going to pay EK 20 bucks for this Seymour route if we get to meet Diddy and go to Diddler island.
Hi, what game is in your footer?Same goes for Lena too, she's the one who's willing to do it. It's a lust option.
Love you bud....Screw it. Time to take one for the team.
You must be registered to see the links
Enjoy, and don't call me a cuck, please.
Can we get Android too good sir?Screw it. Time to take one for the team.
You must be registered to see the links
Enjoy, and don't call me a cuck, please.
Can we get Android too good sir?
I don't really view it from the perspective of the player here, but Jeremy himself -- i think that the fact he doesn't hold out longer is actually in his favor, instead of against him. It's pretty much what i'd expect a normal human do in such situation, so this realism makes him a better character (not better as in more virtuous, obv., the other better)It shouldn't. I have no issue with the player having the option to go after him and continuing to do so. I'd even find him more enticing to chase myself if he couldn't fold the very first time you try.
Fair, but we can just as well blame Lena and Ian for a lot of their actions after they make big speeches about how bad it feels to be cheated on, etc. I don't think too many people hate on themselves for this hypocrisy in playing their Lena and/or Ian in such manner, and think less of these characters, as they blame Jeremy for his giving in.I would agree, but the bro-code is one Jeremy claims to abide by himself. If he didn't make the big speech about it first I wouldn't blame him for failing to uphold it either.
It's just optics -- Perry's frequently yapping and chastising his friends for even noting that a friend's girlfriend is woman, let alone a sexy one, "because bro code" is really annoying. So if i saw Jeremy staunchly and quite unreasonably imo refuse Lena to the bitter end "because bro code" it'd make him appear less like a character he tries to be (a laid-back skirt chaser) and more like Perry with his bro code obsession. And one Perry is more than enough.I don't think I understand what you are arguing here, can you explain?
Thanks.Screw it. Time to take one for the team.
You must be registered to see the links
Enjoy, and don't call me a cuck, please.
Hey, would you uplod the win version on Mega, please? Thanx, man!Screw it. Time to take one for the team.
You must be registered to see the links
Enjoy, and don't call me a cuck, please.
thanks good sir. posted my first reply just to thank you.Screw it. Time to take one for the team.
You must be registered to see the links
Enjoy, and don't call me a cuck, please.
What if you also have romantic feelings for that someone? What if that friend of yours happens to be a guy who "has romantic feelings" for every other woman you two meet? What if Jeremy was the one who told Ian he's got romantic feelings for Lena, how many players do you think would turn down her persistent advances towards them out of respect for their bro's feelings? Or even refrain from pursuing her themselves? (ohai Cindy)I disagree with this. If a friend says he has romantic feelings for someone then it should be understood that that someone is off limits.
You really think so? I know Lena is hot but we're talking about a dude who's already banging Louise and potentially doing Ivy here, would it really be that inhuman of him to be able to resist the girl his friend likes just because she's attractive? I guess it's just a element we have to disagree on.I don't really view it from the perspective of the player here, but Jeremy himself -- i think that the fact he doesn't hold out longer is actually in his favor, instead of against him. It's pretty much what i'd expect a normal human do in such situation, so this realism makes him a better character (not better as in more virtuous, obv., the other better)
Like I said before I am not trying to attribute blame here.Fair, but we can just as well blame Lena and Ian for a lot of their actions after they make big speeches about how bad it feels to be cheated on, etc. I don't think too many people hate on themselves for this hypocrisy in playing their Lena and/or Ian in such manner, and think less of these characters, as they blame Jeremy for his giving in.
It's the opposite to me. I guess the difference is that Jeremy is in a situation that actually tests his adherence to the bro-code, which he subscribes to by his own claim. I think it'd really affirm his place as a bro to Ian for the player.It's just optics -- Perry's frequently yapping and chastising his friends for even noting that a friend's girlfriend is woman, let alone a sexy one, "because bro code" is really annoying. So if i saw Jeremy staunchly and quite unreasonably imo refuse Lena to the bitter end "because bro code" it'd make him appear less like a character he tries to be (a laid-back skirt chaser) and more like Perry with his bro code obsession. And one Perry is more than enough.
How dare you, you know your reactions are mine to have. Stop reacting to other people's comments!!(i'm out of reactions for the day, btw. Sorry about that ._.
Alrighty.Hey, would you uplod the win version on Mega, please? Thanx, man!