If you "take only her route" as in dating and romancing her, she won't seek out Jeremy on her own.pls help how to unlock this scene, have threesome with alison and take only her toute, but don`t see this scene
URMWhats that program for renpy to basically edit your save in game? So you could flag certain things as true/false or to open up all possible dialogue options?
If you're not happy then I hope you find peace.Im not happy,next update is Ivy central,more crimes from her,more backstabbing,more drugs,MORE EVIL!
Im going to laugh my ass off when Billy fucks that ass before Ian through
They already fucked, it just happened off screenIm going to laugh my ass off when Billy fucks that ass before Ian through
Mark sending the picture to Ivy without Holly's permission doesn't exempt Ivy from her responsability for forwarding it to Lena (and god knows who else) without permission.Sure, why not. (about Ivy sending the pictures to Lena, Mark is a questionable case but then that's Mark, not Ivy)
I think that people are entirely within their rights to expect other people to not share private and explicit pictures of them without their consent, not really something where you can argue "Holly should have known better" while simultaneously excusing Ivy's behavior and saying she isn't "corrupting" Holly. Also as you said Holly has only potentially done anything sexual with Lena and it is arguable if she would want Lena to see those pictures, Ivy sends those to Lena all the same if the corruption arc is happening because she don't give a fuck.You think that Holly is somehow naive enough to think that Ivy isn't telling and showing Lena what Holly has been up to, where the three of them have potentially fucked together in public shower? Or that Ivy would be hiding that from Holly, when it's pretty reasonable to think at this point Holly wouldn't give a fuck about Lena seeing those pictures?
I don't know how far into the "radical free will" direction you want to argue, but unless you want to ignore the existence of pushers, enablers and deny the existence of any kind of social influence, then I will point out once again that Ivy is really insistent in propagandizing her lifestyle and targetting insecurities to manipulate other people.That's hardly a problem, given those people are perfectly capable of not going along with Ivy's suggestions. Yes, Ivy is one of these people who think they have everything figured out and their way is best, but then this is something that can be said about many characters in the game. Emma, Cindy, Alison, Minerva, Perry, Jeremy, heck even Robert, and of course people like Axel and Seymour. None of them are good at taking other people's view into account or change their minds about things.
Is your argument that the literal corruption route results in a corrupted Holly? I wouldn't take the validation of a fetish in a porn game as meaning anything. Even in GGGB a lot of the "bad girl" routes had happy endings for Ash, that does not mean she made sound moral decisions or was "right".And clearly, she's also not wrong in how things she offers Holly are something Holly actually enjoys, otherwise she'd hardly change her behavior the way she did, nor would she keep hanging out with Ivy.
But what if Iris is included.If Eva has the gall to let Billy introduce Tyrone to Lena and Ivy, I rage.
Thats the thing,the next one is going to be on screen,Ivy fans are going to be so happyThey already fucked, it just happened off screen
I'm mostly arguing that with Ivy and Holly becoming friends, they're probably considerably less uptight about "mah privacy" in the context of sending sexy selfies to another friend they've been sexual with. And that it's perfectly plausible for Ivy to be upfront with Holly about sharing these pictures with Lena, instead of doing it behind Holly's back.Mark sending the picture to Ivy without Holly's permission doesn't exempt Ivy from her responsability for forwarding it to Lena (and god knows who else) without permission. I think that people are entirely within their rights to expect other people to not share private and explicit pictures of them without their consent, not really something where you can argue "Holly should have known better" while simultaneously excusing Ivy's behavior and saying she isn't "corrupting" Holly.
Existence of these factors doesn't mean people are incapable of saying no, or expressing displeasure or discomfort when they were coerced into doing something that caused them either of these feelings. If not to the person responsible, then to one's other friends. Not only Holly shows no signs of such reactions, but she also willingly participates in casual sex entirely on her own and without any input from Ivy. So i think it's reasonable to accept simple possibility her continuous participation is out of her own volition.I don't know how far into the "radical free will" direction you want to argue, but unless you want to ignore the existence of pushers, enablers and deny the existence of any kind of social influence, then I will point out once again that Ivy is really insistent in propagandizing her lifestyle and targetting insecurities to manipulate other people.
Stubbornness *and* very little interest in trying to see things from other person's point of view, or even showing any real interest in the feelings of those other people. Both Cindy and Alison are mostly concerned about what they want and the problems in their own lives. They expect to always be listened to, but rarely listening themselves.Idk what you were cooking with Cindy (I guess the single-minded stubborness?) or with Alison (she's in a midlife crisis and easily suggestible towards anything, her "tough" personality is barely allowing her to cope).
Emma regularly tries to push her views of Seymour on Lena despite earlier disagreements, and she dislikes Lena disagreeing with her about it, to the point where it'll damage the relationship score. She'll similarly dislike it if Lena displays opinions on other subjects which don't match her own.Emma actually has several conversations about how she won't push her lifestyle on other people, the vegan thing is an easy example, I do not recall any instances of her acting condescending or treating someone as lesser for disagreeing with her, even her beef with Seymour is much more about opposing his actions and their consequences.
My argument is that the whole "corruption" thing is bullshit and the idea that Ivy shows Holly how to have fun in ways Holly hasn't experienced, and that Holly has the nerve to enjoy this experience, isn't really basis for any sort of hand-wringing how bad Ivy is for doing it. Holly isn't becoming a worse or "corrupted" person because she learns that casual sex is something she likes.Is your argument that the literal corruption route results in a corrupted Holly?
Really, enjoying casual sex makes Holly a "baddie"? Why would you say that?Holly will embrace her inner lust and become a baddie alongside Ivy or whatever and everyone lives happily ever after.
It's a bug, the game doesn't take into account a condition which should exclude that scene on the Trinity route.Right after the second Holly Trinity sex scene my playthrough jumps to a really short scene between Lena and Ian that feels disconected from everything. Is this a bug or its just like that?
"baddie" as in a compliment. Hot, confident, seductive, etc. Her general demeanor is already changing towards that in the corruption route, I never said it was wholly a bad thing, just that I don't respect how Ivy goes about it and that it could easily have ended as a bad thing.Really, enjoying casual sex makes Holly a "baddie"? Why would you say that?
Yes. Closest she can do to him is blow him during the bet, they count that as just as a drunken game and fooling around (sure). But once Lena fucked him, she won't get into a serious relationship with Ian, since she slept with his friend.Is it true that if I want Lena to agree to a serious relationship with Ian, she cannot wake up Jeremy while he's sleeping in Louise's bed?