- Apr 19, 2023
- 19
- 216
jack is so boring tbh
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
Last edited:
I dont like him, and I dont like Lena cheating on Ian with other dudes xDYou don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
You get than situation with Marcel and I bet he will continue to be the worst bro ever and will tell Ian nothing.After replaying the epilogue i think it would have been much better if it was Jeremy who caught Lena and Axel in the toilet, It would be interesting to see if he would snitch on Lena or keep it a secret from Ian, and what if Lena fucked both Jeremy and Axel, That will definitely create some tension.
Fucking Opportunist! I bet if Jeremy had a chance with Cindy he would've jumped on her. Fucker said "I don't ever steal in friend's house". Fucking Hypocrites are what Ian had to deal with(shaking my head)You get than situation with Marcel and I bet he will continue to be the worst bro ever and will tell Ian nothing.
That exactly right. Gallery is a bit weird. i don't play scenes in gallery but only check which scenes are in-game.So according to the gallery there is a path where Lena has not cheated on Ian, but can cheat with Jack, but when I checked the requirements for her to call him hot and progress that path either no couple route or cheating route need to be active. So in other words Lena going from faithful to cheating with Jack seems to only be accessible in the gallery. Am I missing something?
Or, from point of view of cheating Lena, the best bro everYou get than situation with Marcel and I bet he will continue to be the worst bro ever and will tell Ian nothing.
Yeah I'm generally the same with the gallery, but I couldn't access the Jack scene on my faithful route and I wasn't about to make a whole new playthrough just for one scene. I think a line of code is missing that allows Lena to go for Jack on the faithful route, just needs her to have a higher lust score.That exactly right. Gallery is a bit weird. i don't play scenes in gallery but only check which scenes are in-game.
The only condition for cheating with Jack is to either be on cheating path or not couple with Ian. Now I believe EK did this so that the branching will be more organized hence less work but yes with a simple Lust check the scene can be made accessible and later tagged as cheating which will automatically fall into cheating path.Yeah I'm generally the same with the gallery, but I couldn't access the Jack scene on my faithful route and I wasn't about to make a whole new playthrough just for one scene. I think a line of code is missing that allows Lena to go for Jack on the faithful route, just needs her to have a higher lust score.
Yes but I think she forgot to add that list check because in the gallery there is unique dialogue for the faithful to cheater route. She says something along the lines "I guess I'm a cheater now"The only condition for cheating with Jack is to either be on cheating path or not couple with Ian. Now I believe EK did this so that the branching will be more organized hence less work but yes with a simple Lust check the scene can be made accessible and later tagged as cheating which will automatically fall into cheating path.
Alternatively, this option is something EK implemented initially, but then changed their mind about it being an option. I mean, people are already complaining how Lena goes for a guy she's barely just met, they'd blow their gasket twice as hard if she could start her cheating on Ian with it.I think a line of code is missing that allows Lena to go for Jack on the faithful route, just needs her to have a higher lust score.
It's inclusion does seem a bit inconsistent with the other entry points to the cheating path. With the others Lena had sort of reason to. Axel, her ex falling into bad habits yadayada. Mike, mad at Ian for either the no sex argument or the stalkfap argument. Mike or Mark at the club, she could only do while on drugs or the mentioned arguments. With Jack it's just, oh hot guy guess I'll fuck.Alternatively, this option is something EK implemented initially, but then changed their mind about it being an option. I mean, people are already complaining how Lena goes for a guy she's barely just met, they'd blow their gasket twice as hard if she could start her cheating on Ian with it.
Only needing 6 lust is kinda low tho nglApparently Lena's lust is taken into consideration in the checks:
View attachment 2980322
I think the checks should be reversed, it doesn't make sense that if Ian and Lena are a couple you need Lena to have already cheated to respond positively to his compliment and for actually do the fucking high lust is enough. It doesn't affect if you are able to cheat with Jack or not, because you need the positive response to the compliment for Jack to propose sex at the end of the night. But still, it feels weird.Alternatively, this option is something EK implemented initially, but then changed their mind about it being an option. I mean, people are already complaining how Lena goes for a guy she's barely just met, they'd blow their gasket twice as hard if she could start her cheating on Ian with it.
Peeking in the game script, there's actually leftover from faithful Lena giving in. It has a higher lust requirement, 8+Only needing 6 lust is kinda low tho ngl
if lena_jack == 2 and v9_axel_sex == False:
// ...
jk "Hey, babe... I was hoping you'd join me for that glass of champagne after all."
menu:
"{image=icon_sad.webp}I have a boyfriend..." if ian_lena_couple:
// ...
l "Yeah, about that... I have a boyfriend, you see..."
jk "And I should be concerned about that because...?"
if lena_cheating:
l "Because I shouldn't cheat on him..."
jk "Come on, you and I both know that's not something you're really worried about. I'm sure it wouldn't be the first time."
l "And what makes you think that?"
jk "Let's just say I have a sixth sense for that kind of thing. I recognize an adventurous girl when I see one."
else:
l "Because I'm not about to cheat on him with a guy who I just met."
jk "Is that your way of asking me to convince you?"
jk "I can play that game, but we both know you're up for a little adventure. Something you can't get from your boyfriend..."
jk "So, are you brave enough to go for what you want?"
menu:
"{image=icon_lust.webp}Cheat on Ian" if lena_cheating or lena_lust > 7:
// ...
lena_jack
to 2 in the initial conversation with faithful Lena. So, yeah, we're back to question if it's a bug or something intentional. Maybe PilotLara knows!Ian is "Sigma on grind". And now in sex scenes his body is used too(Lena thinking about Ian's body musculature while having sex in threesome with Louise and now in Epilogue too). Ian is constantly hitting gym, preparing for tournament, upgrades his wardrobe, everyone(Jeremy, Alison, Perry, Lena and other's) comments about Ian that he is getting ripped. Choked Ivy in gym session, pulls out cam automatically in epilogue. He will catch upto them in an episode or so.Ian don't stand a chance against player alpha Jack. He totally demolished Lena in that scene. I wish Ian would be more dominant
There are two things that seem to be true for every Lena:Ian is "Sigma on grind". And now in sex scenes his body is used too(Lena thinking about Ian's body musculature while having sex in threesome with Louise and now in Epilogue too). Ian is constantly hitting gym, preparing for tournament, upgrades his wardrobe, everyone(Jeremy, Alison, Perry, Lena and other's) comments about Ian that he is getting ripped. Choked Ivy in gym session, pulls out cam automatically in epilogue. He will catch upto them in an episode or so.![]()
The scene is intentional that Lena can only get this scenario if she is cheating.Peeking in the game script, there's actually leftover from faithful Lena giving in. It has a higher lust requirement, 8+
So, this is right now inaccessible because you can't getPython:if lena_jack == 2 and v9_axel_sex == False: // ... jk "Hey, babe... I was hoping you'd join me for that glass of champagne after all." menu: "{image=icon_sad.webp}I have a boyfriend..." if ian_lena_couple: // ... l "Yeah, about that... I have a boyfriend, you see..." jk "And I should be concerned about that because...?" if lena_cheating: l "Because I shouldn't cheat on him..." jk "Come on, you and I both know that's not something you're really worried about. I'm sure it wouldn't be the first time." l "And what makes you think that?" jk "Let's just say I have a sixth sense for that kind of thing. I recognize an adventurous girl when I see one." else: l "Because I'm not about to cheat on him with a guy who I just met." jk "Is that your way of asking me to convince you?" jk "I can play that game, but we both know you're up for a little adventure. Something you can't get from your boyfriend..." jk "So, are you brave enough to go for what you want?" menu: "{image=icon_lust.webp}Cheat on Ian" if lena_cheating or lena_lust > 7: // ...
lena_jack
to 2 in the initial conversation with faithful Lena. So, yeah, we're back to question if it's a bug or something intentional. Maybe PilotLara knows!