I think we're going in circles at this point. My stance is that given the lack of proof for Perry's supposed complete selfishness it's reasonable to believe his apparent concern for his friend is at least partially genuine. What you consider to be my presumption is what we can actually see in the game, vs your presumption (Perry's complete selfishness) which we can't observe.Right, but now you're also just presuming those things prove your view aren't you which is what you don't seem to want to grasp here.
At the risk of invoking a meme "we're not the same".