Arthur's path, but that scene with the fart was only available in the alpha, then she removed the fart sound.I rimjob what? lol. Glad I missed that, but... what path was it on, out of morbid curiosity?![]()
Arthur's path, but that scene with the fart was only available in the alpha, then she removed the fart sound.I rimjob what? lol. Glad I missed that, but... what path was it on, out of morbid curiosity?![]()
That sounds both nasty and hilarious wtf,are you serious?Arthur's path, but that scene with the fart was only available in the alpha, then she removed the fart sound.
The scene, including the farting sound, is still in the game. Eva Kiss' finest work to date.Arthur's path, but that scene with the fart was only available in the alpha, then she removed the fart sound.
EK: 'But I don't want ORS to become another GGGB.'Maybe it used to be, but the Epilogue has two BBC scenes that don't even make sense or have a proper build up, not to mention Eva's own stated emphasis on as many fetishes as possible in later episodes. All in all, it's getting to the point where the game can turn into the fuckfest that GGGB was.
Perhaps.....Billie Eilish looks like Lena? LOL
also this other girl Alex Coal (idk who she is...) also not looking like Lena
Lena looks like a million bucks compared with those two bitches
here you go, Lena IRL
View attachment 726312
There is no ending for anyone yetIs there an ending with the thicc little alt girl friend? Can't remember her name. Emma maybe?
When you choose to play a new game, you get three choices. I forgot what they are; it is like a Goldilocks situation. Anyway....one of them allows you to unlock the galleries.Any full save or gallery unlock ?
Specifically, the Cheat Mode.one of them allows you to unlock the galleries.
Because EK said they wanted to try something else, more grounded with this new game. It's not a matter of daring, but simply setting different goals for oneself. So "already did it in the past" is, if anything, making it less likely there's going to be an identical encore.What I don't understand is why they think Eva Kiss isn't going to dare to do a two-guy scene with Lena or even a gangbang when she already did it in the past, that's why I don't understand why they think it's impossible for it to happen, then it will be our choice if We want to see the scene or not it will depend on the tastes of each player
Considering the direction of the game and all likelyhood of things? It's bound to happen, just to pander and sell more content while shafting the story with completely out of left field, zero build up at all scenes just to have 'Lena get railed/cuck Ian/whatever fetish is the most trending' in terms of scenes.Because EK said they wanted to try something else, more grounded with this new game. It's not a matter of daring, but simply setting different goals for oneself. So "already did it in the past" is, if anything, making it less likely there's going to be an identical encore.
Although certainly, there's no actual guarantee that such scene(s) won't be included.
Hello, there was a mod for edit variables. We can use this mod with every Renpy games. What is the name of it I can't remember ?
Well, among her fantasies you have: threesome with women, threesome with men, big cocks, being dominated, exhibitionism and lesbian fantasy. In fact, if she has a lesbian fantasy and threesome fantasy with women and tells Ian that she prefers not to try his fantasy (with two women), she adds that she wouldn't mind it with two men. It's kind of weird how she fits in there, but there it is.If you watch porn on Ian's PC it already gives you an indication and if you add that there are several dialogues where Lena hints at wanting threesomes with two guys, clearly he is going to see threesomes with two men and Lena, possibly a gangbang with Alison if he's lucky, Just as I think you are going to see domination sex with Axel and maybe Seymour, as I said before it will be our decision to see the content or not.
I have also presented my reasoning. You were saying that my reasoning were just "presumptuous". You ignored the points that I made. No facts? I have literally presented them which you just ignored by then assuming I'm just making "presumptuous" for having such thoughts. If you can't even make an effort in looking for them, then I'm not making an effort in representing them again.There's no presumption here -- i have presented my reasoning and you didn't say a single word that'd actually refute it. There's no facts for you to base your claim on, and no facts which you'd cite to support your point, so opinion is the only alternative that's left. If you think differently, feel free to state what you think you're basing your statements on. Because you have yet to do it.
The shape of earth can be observed and measured with devices which don't have presumptions or perceptions. Both "flat" and "sphere" are also clearly defined. This is not matter of opinion, but facts. It's disingenuous for you to put yourself in the role of the reasonable person in this analogy, when your observations in our discussion were of completely different nature.
In terms of content, fun fact. There's 4 sex scenes for Ian/Minerva and also 4 sex scenes for Ian/Cindy. In terms of player satisfaction, there's many more voices expressing dissatisfaction with Cindy's (lack of) appearances in the game as of late, than about limited presence of Minerva. So, one could make a point that Cindy's fans actually feel less catered to, than Minerva's fans.
And herein lies the crux of the issue: you have yet to define what you actually consider as "being catered to". So, instead of asking me this question and shifting the burden on me, how about you make your point in full first and describe precisely how you evaluate this "catering to" Minerva's and Cindy's paths? Then we will have something tangible to apply to the rest of the discussion, instead of apparently expecting me to just somehow know what you think, when you can't be bothered to articulate it.
Absolutely not what i said. If you want to fight strawmen then don't bother. It's a pure waste of both your and mine time.
For the record, what i actually meant wasn't "you can't say that" but "what you're saying is unrealistic [and thus naive and/or stupid]". This doesn't mean you can't say it. By all means, knock yourself out.