SerHawkes

Engaged Member
Oct 29, 2017
3,545
15,840
Maybe it used to be, but the Epilogue has two BBC scenes that don't even make sense or have a proper build up, not to mention Eva's own stated emphasis on as many fetishes as possible in later episodes. All in all, it's getting to the point where the game can turn into the fuckfest that GGGB was.
EK: 'But I don't want ORS to become another GGGB.'
-Starts turning it into another GGGB fetish fuckfest...-

You were saying EK?
 

Andrea9999

Active Member
Nov 9, 2022
768
1,190
Hardcore and submissive eroticism are two different things. The former, taken to its extreme, all blends together to look alike; the latter, requiring much more imagination might keep those electric tingles going through the body for a long, long time. While the former may give shuddering orgasms....I know from personal experience that the latter can give those shattering orgasms that leave the body completely relaxed.

Of course....the complete relaxing of the body can result in an embarrassing display.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
 
Last edited:

ffive

Devoted Member
Jun 19, 2022
9,325
22,898
What I don't understand is why they think Eva Kiss isn't going to dare to do a two-guy scene with Lena or even a gangbang when she already did it in the past, that's why I don't understand why they think it's impossible for it to happen, then it will be our choice if We want to see the scene or not it will depend on the tastes of each player
Because EK said they wanted to try something else, more grounded with this new game. It's not a matter of daring, but simply setting different goals for oneself. So "already did it in the past" is, if anything, making it less likely there's going to be an identical encore.

Although certainly, there's no actual guarantee that such scene(s) won't be included.
 

SerHawkes

Engaged Member
Oct 29, 2017
3,545
15,840
Because EK said they wanted to try something else, more grounded with this new game. It's not a matter of daring, but simply setting different goals for oneself. So "already did it in the past" is, if anything, making it less likely there's going to be an identical encore.

Although certainly, there's no actual guarantee that such scene(s) won't be included.
Considering the direction of the game and all likelyhood of things? It's bound to happen, just to pander and sell more content while shafting the story with completely out of left field, zero build up at all scenes just to have 'Lena get railed/cuck Ian/whatever fetish is the most trending' in terms of scenes.

Meanwhile there is Ivy who haven't gotten a proper pairing with Ian in 3, going on to 4 years now. Emma is radio silent from Ian's life now for whatever reasoning... So I'm fully expecting a shaft job of the highest order and more fetish pandering here on out. And to think... this game ACTUALLY HAD POTENTIAL to be something different from GGGB. To have an actual story and characters that were just tropes or fetish beacons.
 

Leongen43

Devoted Member
Dec 4, 2022
8,484
89,052
If you watch porn on Ian's PC it already gives you an indication and if you add that there are several dialogues where Lena hints at wanting threesomes with two guys, clearly he is going to see threesomes with two men and Lena, possibly a gangbang with Alison if he's lucky, Just as I think you are going to see domination sex with Axel and maybe Seymour, as I said before it will be our decision to see the content or not.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: axy2 and SerHawkes

Cickic

Newbie
Feb 29, 2020
84
71
Hello, there was a mod for edit variables. We can use this mod with every Renpy games. What is the name of it I can't remember ?

Are you referring to being able to edit variables in your save games?
I haven't came across a Renpy game that it didn't work with yet.
 

Sethmsf

Member
Sep 23, 2022
192
363
If you watch porn on Ian's PC it already gives you an indication and if you add that there are several dialogues where Lena hints at wanting threesomes with two guys, clearly he is going to see threesomes with two men and Lena, possibly a gangbang with Alison if he's lucky, Just as I think you are going to see domination sex with Axel and maybe Seymour, as I said before it will be our decision to see the content or not.
Well, among her fantasies you have: threesome with women, threesome with men, big cocks, being dominated, exhibitionism and lesbian fantasy. In fact, if she has a lesbian fantasy and threesome fantasy with women and tells Ian that she prefers not to try his fantasy (with two women), she adds that she wouldn't mind it with two men. It's kind of weird how she fits in there, but there it is.

On the other hand, I think we will see hard physical domination with Axel, mental domination with Seymour and I think that with Ian, with whom she sometimes says that she likes how he takes control and dominates her, we will see a middle physical domination..
 

WatsonJohn

Member
Jul 27, 2020
410
933
There's no presumption here -- i have presented my reasoning and you didn't say a single word that'd actually refute it. There's no facts for you to base your claim on, and no facts which you'd cite to support your point, so opinion is the only alternative that's left. If you think differently, feel free to state what you think you're basing your statements on. Because you have yet to do it.


The shape of earth can be observed and measured with devices which don't have presumptions or perceptions. Both "flat" and "sphere" are also clearly defined. This is not matter of opinion, but facts. It's disingenuous for you to put yourself in the role of the reasonable person in this analogy, when your observations in our discussion were of completely different nature.


In terms of content, fun fact. There's 4 sex scenes for Ian/Minerva and also 4 sex scenes for Ian/Cindy. In terms of player satisfaction, there's many more voices expressing dissatisfaction with Cindy's (lack of) appearances in the game as of late, than about limited presence of Minerva. So, one could make a point that Cindy's fans actually feel less catered to, than Minerva's fans.

And herein lies the crux of the issue: you have yet to define what you actually consider as "being catered to". So, instead of asking me this question and shifting the burden on me, how about you make your point in full first and describe precisely how you evaluate this "catering to" Minerva's and Cindy's paths? Then we will have something tangible to apply to the rest of the discussion, instead of apparently expecting me to just somehow know what you think, when you can't be bothered to articulate it.


Absolutely not what i said. If you want to fight strawmen then don't bother. It's a pure waste of both your and mine time.

For the record, what i actually meant wasn't "you can't say that" but "what you're saying is unrealistic [and thus naive and/or stupid]". This doesn't mean you can't say it. By all means, knock yourself out.
I have also presented my reasoning. You were saying that my reasoning were just "presumptuous". You ignored the points that I made. No facts? I have literally presented them which you just ignored by then assuming I'm just making "presumptuous" for having such thoughts. If you can't even make an effort in looking for them, then I'm not making an effort in representing them again.
Like I said it's not just about sex scenes but scenes in general. Cindy has a lot more content and presence in the game. Even in gallery, she has more artwork. And my point still stands. That's exactly my point. People have pointed out that Cindy gets a lot of attention in game. You can literally see that Cindy is more catered to. It's odd how you keep making irrelevant points. Minerva having the same actual sex scenes with Cindy is not the same as Minerva having the same content as Cindy.
I have described what "catered to" means. And if you don't know what it means, then you can read it in the dictionary. You have the burden on you because you were saying this is just my presumption even though I have given points how that is the case. You were saying crying "presumption, presumption" and then when pointed out that your argument can be also easily be cried with another "presumption, presumption", you say strawman.
If you can't even be bothered to read and understand what I'm typing, then don't bother to respond.
 
4.60 star(s) 382 Votes