No its not, otherwise onlyfans wouldn't exist.
Yes it is, onlyfans banned sexually explicit content because of pressure from banks and the founder Tim Stokely said as much,
"In an interview with the Financial Times on Tuesday, OnlyFans founder Tim Stokely said the company was
forced to ban pornography on the site and blamed "unfair" treatment by
banks that made it difficult for the company to pay content creators."
They only reversed the banned after negotiations with the banks lead to "We have secured assurances necessary to support our diverse creator community and have suspended the planned October 1 policy change,"
" The decision came a day after the CEO
attributed the porn ban to banks which would “cite reputation risk and refuse our business.” OnlyFans executives told the FT that Stokely’s comments had sparked open discussion between banks and the company. "
Some people are still nervous about the unbanning and there is a worry that the ban might be issued again.
"Brian Gross, a publicist and president of BSG PR who represents several adult stars who use OnlyFans, including Maitland Ward and Charlotte Stokely, said OnlyFans' ban reversal is "obviously good news" for creators, but the rapid about-face has caused "trepidation and nervousness."
"There's always a chance (OnlyFans) can implement the policy again," he said. "I think everyone has to keep one eye open."
Sources below
You must be registered to see the links
You must be registered to see the links
You must be registered to see the links
It is also a very, very different situation both financially and in a business sense, which is why it would be easier for onlyfans to lift their ban (for now) but the problem is the same, banks NOT patreon, are to blame for the bans.
Also before
anyone blames patreon again, it might be a good idea to look into just how many campaigns the banks and financial services have run against the different sectors or the adult industry.