They don't. Anything that looks like a family setting will fall under their incest ban.Does anyone know if patreon allows for "step sibling" content?
nuts, Subscribe star seems to not care, at least seemingly from the many incest games on there.They don't. Anything that looks like a family setting will fall under their incest ban.
Hrm... no? As the post you linked points out, theYou're in luck,You must be registered to see the linksso go hog wild.
Patreon's Current Community Guidelines said:Offensive and graphic creations:
We understand that artists sometimes have to push boundaries to create thought-provoking art, so we don’t review offensive and graphic creations with strict black and white guidelines. We instead review creations in the context of the whole creator page. However, we have zero tolerance when it comes to the glorification of sexual violence which includes bestiality, rape, and child exploitation (i.e., sexualized depiction of minors). This is true for illustrated, animated, or any other type of creations. Patreon reserves the right to review and remove accounts that may violate this guideline. We also do not allow other fringe sexual fetish creations, such as incest, necrophilia, or fetish creations that are hard to distinguish from non-consensual sex. We understand that some topics on this list such as incest or rape are a little bit more complicated because these situations are, unfortunately, part of real life. As a result, when reviewing these types of creations, the Trust and Safety team will take into consideration context including personal, historical or educational narrative. For example, survivor stories or fiction such as Lolita are allowed on Patreon.
I agree, not only revenge porn, but upskirt pictures or hidden cam pics. Those are now allowed when dealing with fictional characters, as no real harm is done.Hrm... no? As the post you linked points out, theYou must be registered to see the linkswas focused on banning actual revenge porn and it has been placed under the 'Bullying and Harassment" subsection. I guess the clarification is that you can still depict a revenge porn situation on your fictional creation, but nothing else. No changes have been made to theYou must be registered to see the links:
Even if you reduce it to that extent, that still clearly contradicts the rule on "no fetish creations that are hard to distinguish from non-consensual sex," so my advice remains the same: go hog wild, you'll either run afoul of their schizophrenic rules or you won't.I guess the clarification is that you can still depict a revenge porn situation on your fictional creation, but nothing else.
Is the difference between "none consensual sex" (still forbidden) and "none consented publication" (what is now permit when fictional), this difficult to do ?Even if you reduce it to that extent, that still clearly contradicts the rule on "no fetish creations that are hard to distinguish from non-consensual sex,"
Actually that's not even it, the policy you linked is about someone creating artwork of someone else (someone famous for instance) without their consentEven if you reduce it to that extent
Probably the part where completely fictious people can (or cannot) consent. Think about it, if you never publish a sex act involving a fictional character then did it actually happen? How would you know if it did?Is the difference between "none consensual sex" (still forbidden) and "none consented publication" (what is now permit when fictional), this difficult to do ?
Many fictitious characters are based on real people, in which case it would still be a violation to create porn of them before this policy change.Probably the part where completely fictious people can (or cannot) consent.
Okay, I update for those who have difficulties to understand abstract concepts:Probably the part where completely fictious people can (or cannot) consent.