What is your weird obsession with attacking me here?
YOU chose to make a poorly worded post in this thread, YOU made it based on a ill-conceived notion, ANY member is allowed to reply to it. Also if you feel I've been attacking you, please feel free to report me, the report button is at the bottom left of each reply.
The context was not clear otherwise I wouldn't have written about how the forum is open to the public???
You are trying to side track this because you know you stuck your foot in it. Here is your post that started this.
How can you actually sit there and type this out while games like "
https://f95zone.to/threads/get-viol...ounter-rpg-max-volume-v1-0-3-b-bishop.119376/" have been on the site for over 3 years. About 5 minutes into this game, after entering the main city for the first time, you are confronted by a "LITTLE GIRL" who refers to herself as such, who then proceeds to give the MC a blowjob, all the while taunting him about how the MC is losing to a "little girl" with a "little mouth." The girl in question of course looks like a pre-pubescent child (narrow hips, no breasts, small frame, short, etc.), and the MC also does not look like an adult. Is it because the "little girl" is the one initiating the bj? If that was the case then Rule 7 wouldn't have such an intense focus on visual depictions in its description. Rule 7 *is* incredibly wishy-washy, and the intense vitriol from mods trying to defend it doesn't help your case against censorship or bias. Even if it is the case that this game should be banned and it slipped through the cracks, it wouldn't explain some of the other games I've ran into on the site that by all means break rule 7. Ultimately, Lolicon is legal in America, so why ban 2D fictional depictions of kids at all? The rule itself restricts freedom of expression for the sake of what exactly? Because of: " attract the attention of a community that like to infest a forum, trash it with its real life p*d*shit content, and stick to it like shit to your shoes " I'm not sure how arbitrarily removing some games, while allowing others helps you avoid this.
I would LOVE for you to explain exactly how "Violated by every girl" does NOT break rule 7.
You start by complaining about replies because a game has been on the site for 3 years, something that WAS addressed by a staff member on PAGE 1 if
YOU bothered to read. The staff members reply would have made even more sense if
YOU bothered to read the terms and rules (which I posted in my last reply)
Your entire argument is based on a game being on the site,
YOU assuming that means it's allowed. A misconception on
YOUR part, so the fault lies with you for 1) not reading, 2) NOT reading and 3) not understanding.
Your next part claims that rule 7 is wishy washy and claim "the intense vitriol from mods trying to defend it doesn't help your case against censorship or bias."
and as I pointed out, it's members like
YOU, who refuse to report games that are the problem. It only looks like there is bias and censorship because
YOU and
others like you refuse to report games as you've been asked to do.
Your next part is delusional about the laws in america, you also (I'm assuming intentionally) disregard the fact that this site caters to an international community and so the laws of one country do NOT dictate the policies or moderation of the site.
Your next part about the "restriction of freedom of expression" has been debunked many times over, in many of these threads, if you want to know how or why go look it up, you seem to need the reading practice.
The assertion that the removal of games is arbitrary, shows
YOU have NOT again bothered to read,
YOU DO NOT know how things work on the site and you refuse to.
and now we get to the part I answered. You wanting to know how the game does not break rule 7.
Which I answered. As you can see, your initial reply is littered with ignorance and a complete and utter failure on your part to read, read, read or to bring anything resembling fact to the topic. Worse yet,
YOU admit to not wanting the games to be removed while slinging mud at the staff and mods when
YOU and
others like you are the main source of the problem and if ANY of you bothered reporting as is asked the moderation of this kind of content would look A LOT less bias.
YOU who refuses to do the simplest of tasks that is asked and then expects members, staff and mods to be answerable to you is a joke at best and if you don't like how things are done AND
YOU choose to be part of the problem and not the solution there are options available to you as I said before
1) You can moan and whine about it and in return catch flak and scorn in threads
2) You can accept it and get that content somewhere else
3) You can go use a different site
Their site, their rules!
p.s. feel free to report this post to if you like.