Collection - Video - Pewposterous Collection [2024-11-17] [Pewposterous]

  1. 4.00 star(s)

    GeorgeWeasley

    The quality is good, just lacking immersion, feels like just a moving pretty picture.
    Most scenes are only one awkward angle or thrust that lacks a finishing scene and ends suddenly, like being blue balled unexpectedly.
    The models are pristine from the angles shown. Generally nothing too extravagant for backgrounds
    Likes: DEVO!
  2. 5.00 star(s)

    palmtrees89

    Great animations, and easily top 5 for me. Really knows how to set up scenes, camera angles, fluidity of body movements, high quality rendering. Just top notch.

    Would love to see some long animations but ay, I'm happy as is. :)

    No doubt a 5-star animator!
  3. 5.00 star(s)

    Wooper33

    Very high-quality professional artist. Models are authentic. The movements are smooth and realistic. His every work is a masterpiece!
    I rarely rate something/someone 5-stars, but when I do - it is deserved.
    Recommend!
  4. 5.00 star(s)

    ( Y )

    Review for the update of the [2022-05-30].

    One of the best 3D artists I've come across, his models are decent, and his digital animation is good, though he can improve.

    Positive things:
    + Excellent 3d anatomical models.
    + Variation of positions and other sexual fetishes.
    + Animation quality, which although sometimes rigid, is very good.
    + Realism, such as the movement of the tits, vaginal lips, the waves of the buttocks due to the thrusts on it, the shaking of joints such as the shoulders, some facial expressions, sweat, seminal fluid, etc.

    Negative things:
    - Unnatural movements in the thrusts.
    - The model in question trespassing itself in the skin chafing.
    - Some bends in the 3d models, such as the joint that connects the forearm to the arm.
    - Big cocks (?), what is this, a porn advertisement that promises to enlarge it with pills of dubious origin?

    I recommend supporting it on its official pages.
  5. 5.00 star(s)

    Half-a-Bubble-Off-Plumb

    First thought this was "live" not CG based on the preview pic. Renders are beautiful, even without the sex. Just the fact that this is here is worthy of 5 stars.
    The quality is not 100% consistent through every file, but that is to be expected, based on subject matter and the very nature of the beast.
    The female models are in good (natural) proportion, well detailed, and just "realistic enough.
    When you add the sheer variety of content, you can't go wrong.

    Thank you!