And what type of behavior is that? You asked for it, he said no... end of story. I'm not blindly defending Oni, I'm suggesting that a little more respect is called for. You can always design your own game with your own time. Otherwise, yours and the complaints of others sound like jealousy (he makes 90k a year and doesn't give me what I want) or laziness (I can't make my own game to jerk off to). Your wallet speaks more than anything you say in this thread. If you don't like it, don't pay for it.
And you answered my question, so this is over with; you're just another nobody looking for a nut. That's all my question to you was meant to be.
You know, this is a somewhat reocurring argument around here; someone bashes Oni for more or less obvious faults regarding his product/working ethic. A person comes saying things like "It's not ok to say bad things about Oni because it's his game" or "you don't have the right to complain if you don't pay for it", but time and time again, those are counterargumented 'til exile.
Let me save you the time to continue this back and forth. The conclusion that's always reached here is as follows:
We can criticize someone regardless of how successful their enterprise might be, due to a lacking product, dishonesty in their communication with their patrons, a clear disregard for opinions voiced in a constructive way AND from a customer, or, as it's more the case, a combination of all of this.
We can also criticize a game we haven't payed for simply because we've played it and thus we are prepared to formulate an opinion on said game, because the very fact that one hasn't invested money on a product does not mean said person loses their rational ability to think (I know you didn't say this, but since both arguments usually appear in tandem, let me take the chance to answer the two).