Runway AI

lamba

Member
Jul 10, 2018
190
285
Don't overestimate the mosquito that you are.
Well, I'm not the one resorting to shoving expletives in every other sentence like we just discovered all the cuss words and want everyone in our class to know it, and I'm not the one getting angry about the fact that people are having a hard time making heads or tails of what you're trying to say.

Looks like my English was correct (at my own surprise) as well as the numbers...
Mmm, no. Your original claim was 2%. Which isn't 1.4%. Which would be the minimum to breach into the thousands. So your math is wrong, you struggle with communicating, you struggle with consistency, you get upset when people can't understand your broken English- again, that part I'd get, English sucks and it is a miserable language to learn and even after you learn it you discover that conversational English is a wildly different animal- and when you're wrong, you're confidently wrong.

Not only I know it relatively well, but in top of this I don't fucking care.
You're going through this much effort for a subject you don't care about.

Right.

Usually when you don't care about something you just ignore it. Like everything else you ignore and don't care about.
 

c3p0

Conversation Conqueror
Respected User
Nov 20, 2017
6,979
16,307
Your original claim was 2%.
As I didn't see that, where exactly did he wrote that?
I only find this one:
Why the fucking fuck would you think that "all 70,000 of those AI companies have a solid business model"? Especially when I, relatively explicitly, said that I assume than less that 2% of them will survive at mid term.
So, as I read it, he mean < 2% and just to be clear that means, for positive numbers only (including 0), the interval [0, 2[ - with exact those brackets.
 

anne O'nymous

I'm not grumpy, I'm just coded that way.
Modder
Donor
Respected User
Jun 10, 2017
12,070
19,105
Well, I'm not the one resorting to shoving expletives in every other sentence like we just discovered all the cuss words and want everyone in our class to know it,
For your information, it's not swearing, in French it's common punctuation.
Ah, French, such a fascinating language that permit to build full sentences totally legit, that make perfect sense, and that will be understood, just with swear words.


and I'm not the one getting angry about the fact that people are having a hard time making heads or tails of what you're trying to say.
As I said, I'm not angry, I'm amazed.


Hmm, looks like it worth doing this:
Emphasis: " ".

So, unlike what poor you thought, I'm not yelling at you. I draw your attention on the words that matters, and that you have clearly systematically discarded when reading me.


Mmm, no. Your original claim was 2%.
I quoted my original claim, linking it to the post where it is located, and I put a ton of emphasis on the "less than 2%"... And I did it twice...

At this level it's no longer bad faith or hypocrisy, it reach cognitive abilities level.


Which isn't 1.4%.
Because the 1.43% (because, yeah, I wrote "1.43%" not "1.4%") was above in the same post. Here again something that I quoted, linked to the post where it is located, with a ton of emphasis on the significant part; and here again, twice.

It's common practice, outside of purely scientific talk, to not stick to the decimal and switch to "less than [rounded integer]" for the rest of the talk; this to not looks too pedantic. This being based on the expectation that the reader have a brain and is able to keep the context for at least few minutes.


Which would be the minimum to breach into the thousands.
What would be ridiculous since I always limited the surviving AI companies to "hundreds"...
Something that, here again, was quoted, linked to the post where it was said, and with the correct emphasis, in the post you answer too.


So your math is wrong, you struggle with communicating, you struggle with consistency,
You've had the sentences right in front of you three times.
For two of those times the significant part that clearly make you struggle where emphasized.
So, sorry, but my math are correct, my English was correct (for once) and I stayed consistent.


you get upset when people can't understand your broken English-
Still not upset, but I starts to worry for you.
You clearly seem so convinced by this, that I wonder if you're able to understand that people can disagree without anger or any negative feelings, nor even positive ones.


You're going through this much effort for a subject you don't care about.
:FacePalm: Context, baby, context...

I don't care if my English is bad to the point that some people can misunderstand what I'm writing.


Usually when you don't care about something you just ignore it.
And I'm ignoring it.

I'm not complaining that you don't understand. At first I was correcting your wrong claims regarding AIs then, through your slow switch to attempt to belittle me, I try to substitute to your English (or whatever is your native language) teacher, and to teach you the basis of communication and understanding.
 

lamba

Member
Jul 10, 2018
190
285
I don't care if my English is bad to the point that some people can misunderstand what I'm writing.
You're writing books about something you claim to not care about. You're also very quick to claim you're not upset when you're clearly upset. I encourage you to continue demonstrating how much you don't care.

For your information, it's not swearing, in French it's common punctuation.
Granted, my French isn't great, but I'm pretty sure 'Fuck' is not French. And at a glance, Google agrees with me.

1751504458502.png

Throwing around obscenities doesn't have the effect you seem to think they do and it's usually dumb teenagers who use them excessively in English.

I quoted my original claim, linking it to the post where it is located, and I put a ton of emphasis on the "less than 2%"... And I did it twice...
So when you said '2%' you really meant 'around 1%' or when you said 'hundreds' you really meant thousands.

Contradictions.
 

anne O'nymous

I'm not grumpy, I'm just coded that way.
Modder
Donor
Respected User
Jun 10, 2017
12,070
19,105
Granted, my French isn't great, but I'm pretty sure 'Fuck' is not French.
Never ever did I said, nor even implied, even from far, that "fuck" was a French word. :FacePalm:
I could explain what I wrote, but it's clear that you really lack the most basic cognitive abilities...

And so goes my career as teacher... Sad...


So when you said '2%' you really meant 'around 1%' or when you said 'hundreds' you really meant thousands.
And now I'm curious...

Is there a doctor among the readers? Preferably a neurosurgeon. And if yes, can he tell me if there's a disease known to prevent someone to see the combination of words "less than"?
If it's the case and it don't have a name yet, I have a proposition to make...
 

c3p0

Conversation Conqueror
Respected User
Nov 20, 2017
6,979
16,307
Is there a doctor among the readers? Preferably a neurosurgeon. And if yes, can he tell me if there's a disease known to prevent someone to see the combination of words "less than"?
If it's the case and it don't have a name yet, I have a proposition to make...
At least you don't need to hate me for one minute one minute is not the same as at least...:whistle:
 

ufjoif

Newbie
Jan 6, 2019
26
15
Runway AI has announced that it's entering the video game industry. A new game (entirely made using AI) is set to be revealed this week. They’ve also stated that anyone will be able to use Runway’s AI models to develop their own games.

What are your thoughts on this?

Do you think AI-CG games will become more advanced than they are now? I’m not necessarily talking about AAA games, but I do feel that in the near future, most text-based and visual novel games will be developed using AI. NTR phone simulators have already started spreading like a zombie virus.
The main use of AI content generation is producing infinite quantities of niche fetish porn. For anything else - why would you ever bother? It's just an inferior version of something that already exists, or a briefly fun toy whose novelty lasts for a week until it gets old. Then you wait for the next model release to come out before you consider reupping your subscription.

Runway, right now, doesn't let you make 18+ content, because they're a bunch of cucks. They won't let you make 18+ games either, so nobody's gonna give a shit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DuniX