- Jan 5, 2022
- 7
- 12
I'm sure others can do it better, I just threw it together with ai and very little knowledge of it
I'm sure others can do it better, I just threw it together with ai and very little knowledge of it
what program did you use?I'm sure others can do it better, I just threw it together with ai and very little knowledge of it
pixai.artwhat program did you use?
well of course it's art, it's just art created with a different tool, it just keeps getting easier, I'm sure many artists in the past felt the same way about everything that revolutionized art. It definitely isn't art that should earn any praise for the creator tho, least not at this pointif it is so easily to replicate then is it really art? sort of like how the manufactured boy/girl bands from korea make cookie cutter music that appeals to the masses. not that i am hating on sciamano, he is my favourite.
creativity will keep getting dumbed down for the sake of convenience because convenience sells better, this definitely wouldn't ever compete with any legendary artists, there definitely needs to be a separation between real art and commercial art and i guess that is what you're suggestingi meant sciamanos drawings. do they count as art. i doubt most artists would dream of doing what he is doing if you ignore money, it is just something that pays the bills. there isn't much creative expression. just drawing sexy ladies. he isn't saying much with his drawings or making the viewer think or feel anything. it is still art in my opinion, just not proper art. it is art if you consider anything made by humans that doesn't 100% serve a practical purpose is art, which I kinda do agree with. but it isn't proper art.
Funniest part is tossing few buckets of ink on 2-billion-worth canvas with 2 randoms blobs on it may actually increase it's value.Workman art is still far superior to any 'modern art' fads going on now where throwing paint on a canvas is somehow worth hundreds of thousands, you don't see any eco activists going in and defacing any of that kind of art now would you?
You do know that some artists in the past did drawings to pay the bills right?creativity will keep getting dumbed down for the sake of convenience because convenience sells better, this definitely wouldn't ever compete with any legendary artists, there definitely needs to be a separation between real art and commercial art and i guess that is what you're suggesting
trueYou do know that some artists in the past did drawings to pay the bills right?
Its alwasy been a thing, just now its more widespread and almost anyone can be an artist if they got the talent
I think what you're thinking about is, if the artist is still respected or not. Once someone goes into only paying bills and it's not for the want to draw or the effort to make it creativly fun, then the respect for the artist dissapears along with the "creative." process.i meant sciamanos drawings. do they count as art. i doubt most artists would dream of doing what he is doing if you ignore money, it is just something that pays the bills. there isn't much creative expression. just drawing sexy ladies. he isn't saying much with his drawings or making the viewer think or feel anything. it is still art in my opinion, just not proper art. it is art if you consider anything made by humans that doesn't 100% serve a practical purpose is art, which I kinda do agree with. but it isn't proper art.
To be fair, while I can only support the intention here, I'm afraid the result is so-sopixai.art
made a LoRA from a bunch of sciamano art, uploaded the original image as a reference, painted over just the area i needed edited and the magic is done, these also worked quite well, can do original art with sciamano artstyle too, but for that you can just use the search bar on that site with "sciamano240"