- Aug 15, 2024
- 46
- 119
For me, most AI art looks the same. I don't know why, but I like to play games where the art is drawn by an artist - I admire their craftmanship. I am not opposed to using AI for your art assets (it's a LOT cheaper than commissioning an artist), but it's just not for me.Changing topics here to ask a question on AI Art:
Over the last few years, I’ve seen a wide range of opinions on AI art being used across different mediums. Most people seem to be either opposed or neutral, with very few expressing excitement about consuming AI-generated art. Some even go as far as to call it offensive, soulless, or “not real art.”
I can understand the anti–AI art perspective and even share some of the same feelings. There’s no denying that some AI art is low-effort and feels soulless.
However, as someone who has been building a game with AI art for around two years, I can’t agree that simply using AI art automatically invalidates the “art” in my work. Even if you write off the art assets, a game involves so much more—programming, story, design, and even animation (in my case, done manually in After Effects). And even when using AI, there’s still a lot of artistic direction involved—world building, scene composition, storyboarding, and guiding the tools toward a vision. Surely, there are multiple places where creativity can shine through?
Anyway, all of this brings me to my main question: What do you all think about AI art in games?
- Would you immediately write off a game if it used AI-generated art?
- Why or why not?
(As a side note - I know a lot of the old art I shared still included some bad AI(fragment, bad fingers, etc)- much been fixed in and will share updated versions soon)
Blindly hating everything made with AI is stupid, but I understand people who have a preference for non-generated art. I wish you the best of luck with your game!