So are we allowing *-* now ?

[_user]

"We want the forum to stay clean without thousands more post to delete each day, the staff to not be arrested, and our members to not have to see pictures that will haunt their nightmares for decades."

Stop over dramatizing, right now you can go on **** and look at lolicon, and that's just one of the many, many places you can find it, on the clean web, thank you Japan. Not allowing it here is definitely a choice, it probably does make the moderation and administration easier however. Not that i'm advocating for rule 7 to go away, if anything I'd rather it be pushed further to no below 18 content, but as long as tags exist to filter that out, I don't care too much.

 

[Count Morado]

Stop over dramatizing, right now you can go on **** and look at lolicon, and that's just one of the many, many places you can find it, on the clean web, thank you Japan. Not allowing it here is definitely a choice, it probably does make the moderation and administration easier however. Not that i'm advocating for rule 7 to go away, if anything I'd rather it be pushed further to no below 18 content, but as long as tags exist to filter that out, I don't care too much.

Yes, it is definitely a choice - a choice for the survivability of this website, not just to make moderation and administration easier. Applicable quotes from the site admin and a (now former) staff member. You can find this time and again when this topic rears its head and people want to argue about it.

 

[_user]

Yes, it is definitely a choice - a choice for the survivability of this website, not just to make moderation and administration easier. Applicable quotes from the site admin and a (now former) staff member. You can find this time and again when this topic rears its head and people want to argue about it.

Most of the arguments are made moot by the fact that the website still hosts lolicon though. Yes they censor part of it, but there's still plenty available, 765 games to be exact, 765 reasons for pedos to come here, 765 reasons for hacktivists to target the website, 765 reasons for the hosts to drop the website. For the sake of "survivability", why aren't we banning anything below 18?

Because as far as i can tell it very much looks like the admin drew a line in the sand, and arbitrarily decided that staying on one side would protect them.

 

[Kuviragames]

The fact that there is even a greyzone is disturbing enough. And I am disgusted how many people defend and active looking for things like that like it's something normal. I mute and ignore this thread now it just triggers me way to hard.

 

[anne O'nymous]

Stop over dramatizing, right now you can go on **** and look at lolicon, [...]

Stop trying to looks more stupid than you already are.

I talked about content that will haunt you for decades, so it's obviously not a question a lolicon
As disgusting as it can looks for someone, it's something really easy to forget, because you know that it's not real...

I'm talking about p*d*shit guys who love to invade a forum once they found one that let it pass when they starts to post their shit. Once there are in the place, you can't get rid of them, the adult scene, gaming but also comics, lost many websites through the time due to this.
And, I repeat, when I talk about "their shit", I don't talk about drawing or 3D render, nor even about AI generated content (yet now they must be a part of it). I talk about real life shit, with real life underage girls and boys being sexually abused by real dicks.
Also, to be totally explicit, when I say "underage", I don't talk about 13yo to 17yo, it starts a 5yo and less.

There's a question of moral, obviously, but it's just the top of the iceberg.
It's all fun and all to fap over a 13yo drawn or 3D rendered character, it's something totally different to see a 5yo with a dick in her cunt, ass or mouth...

And if you're too stupid to understand this...

 

[c3p0]

Yes, it is definitely a choice - a choice for the survivability of this website, not just to make moderation and administration easier. Applicable quotes from the site admin and a (now former) staff member. You can find this time and again when this topic rears its head and people want to argue about it.
View attachment 4577251
View attachment 4577258
View attachment 4577257
View attachment 4577262
View attachment 4577261

I take my hat off to you for your post in some circular discussion that happens at least 2 times a week and didn't change since what Sam has written for over 7 years.

Also:

 

[tanstaafl]

Hebophilia and ephebophilia exist too. It's interesting that people only notice loli content when there are games with teens/barely legal characters under the disguise that they are 18+.

This is why that realistic vs not realistic judgement exists in the first place. Nobody is trying to judge exact ages here like going through a clip board, they're looking for realistic children (pedo, hebe and ephebo all together in that one) and zapping them with prejudice. The rest have at least minimal plausible deniability...as judged by those who make the decision. It's also why some things last and some things that are old suddenly disappear. It's not a firm line, it wiggles.

Most of the arguments are made moot by the fact that the website still hosts lolicon though. Yes they censor part of it, but there's still plenty available, 765 games to be exact, 765 reasons for pedos to come here, 765 reasons for hacktivists to target the website, 765 reasons for the hosts to drop the website. For the sake of "survivability", why aren't we banning anything below 18?

Because as far as i can tell it very much looks like the admin drew a line in the sand, and arbitrarily decided that staying on one side would protect them.

I know there are a lot of posts in this thread but this has been covered at least a dozen times already. Thank you for regurgitating.

 

[Dryme]

This is why that realistic vs not realistic judgement exists in the first place. Nobody is trying to judge exact ages here like going through a clip board, they're looking for realistic children (pedo, hebe and ephebo all together in that one) and zapping them with prejudice. The rest have at least minimal plausible deniability...as judged by those who make the decision. It's also why some things last and some things that are old suddenly disappear. It's not a firm line, it wiggles.


I know there are a lot of posts in this thread but this has been covered at least a dozen times already. Thank you for regurgitating.

I would like to see an opinion where such content is praised

 

[tanstaafl]

I would like to see an opinion where such content is praised

No.