- Dec 5, 2021
- 131
- 62
You're not supposed to buy the overpriced coffee.i bought her coffee but i got stuck
should i do something? i cant seem to interact tho
yeah , now im in a bug when i ask her to go to my house because i will fck, but she has that touch even and i did that too but after im done, i cant interact againYou're not supposed to buy the overpriced coffee.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
aii nvm, i will ask instead why i cant finger herdamn it, when i bring the clerk home, got bug again View attachment 3208960 cant interact
Nope, I don't think so, maybe. For me personally who works on decensoring the texture, every scene or arts have an amazing shading works. At least after bath sex update where the art style changed drastically. You can compare it with the background or some of their other works in ci-en or X if you want to make sureDoes the artist use ai generation in his art? In their latest 2 posts on Ci-en I looked at I saw a sketch which seemed normal to me but the finished version looks so much like ai generated art to me that I worry how much of their art is ai generated... Anyone else noticed this?
Nope, I don't think so, the character still looks the same, just improved with better shading, proportions and angles.Does the artist use ai generation in his art? In their latest 2 posts on Ci-en I looked at I saw a sketch which seemed normal to me but the finished version looks so much like ai generated art to me that I worry how much of their art is ai generated... Anyone else noticed this?
You're first picture is already proof that the answer is "No". AI art generation doesn't work anything like human art. Blocking out the background, laying out simple line drawings, filling, shading, etc... these are all things only human artists do.Does the artist use ai generation in his art? In their latest 2 posts on Ci-en I looked at I saw a sketch which seemed normal to me but the finished version looks so much like ai generated art to me that I worry how much of their art is ai generated... Anyone else noticed this?
People find anything "AI" objectionable but they forget how much time it takes to draw, animate and do many things by hand.You're first picture is already proof that the answer is "No". AI art generation doesn't work anything like human art. Blocking out the background, laying out simple line drawings, filling, shading, etc... these are all things only human artists do.
This is a very loose analogy, so take it with a huge grain of salt, but... AI art is generated in a process much more like if you took a very blurry/out-of-focus image then slowly started trying to unblur it by adding detail in. And from that detail, you can add further detail, and so on, recursively. (In reality, it's noise, rather than blur, that is the starting point, but the refining process is very similar.)
That said, it wouldn't surprise me if the artist is using AI-based shading tools as those are an active area of development. But the use of such tools isn't generally considered part of the "ai generated art" that people find objectionable.
That's not how these detectors work, they analyze the image, looking for patterns, noise, stuff typically AI will generate, just because image has smooth gradients and blurry background does not make it AI generated, that and you can train models on anything, SD is open source remember, most models aside are trained by the community and they train it on just about every style imaginable.jfyi this ai-testing tool will detect basically anything as "ai-generated" when subject has smooth gradiens (no noise) and background is blurry / has bokeh; it's all mostly due to training models on japanese and korean candid pictures with aperture generally in range of 1.4~3.0
It looks a bit like ai-generated, though. And the funniest thing would be it really being ai generated art he later on scrapped all background data and dithered to basic color tones. With few sketches here and there.