[Stable Diffusion] Prompt Sharing and Learning Thread

Jimwalrus

Jimwalrus

Active Member
Sep 15, 2021
891
3,287
Sepheyer said:
From "oh wow" to "fuuk" in under three seconds:
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
Click to expand...
Re-running the generation with the same parameters, but setting it to run 30 steps of upscale x2 (to 1024x1024) with a denoise of just 0.1 seems to fix the hand (and puts a glove on, which is in the prompt, but not the original image):
00000-207294279-gorgeous woman from Brazil._plus size model._narrow shoulders._DD size sagging...png
Effectively, upscaling isn't just there to improve resolution, it can also be used to fix, enhance (or completely fuck up) features. It's not as easily directed though, so it's much more of a crap shoot.

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
 
Last edited:
  • Red Heart
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: silversalmon68, Heinzmonkey, yomimmo and 4 others
Sepheyer

Sepheyer

Well-Known Member
Dec 21, 2020
1,527
3,597
Check out this post with stunning artwork by Jimwalrus : link

It got me thinking and tweaking. First, the motivating bit:

00014-1282091597-penthouses centerfold style.__gorgeous woman from Brazil._plus size model._na...png

Second, the real question: to what extent the image height parameter affects the entire image?

Well, let's find out. Here are a bunch of tests using same prompt but different image sizes:
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
512x513 - doesn't exist, as the render defaults to 512x512, it just ignores "512x513" command.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
So, yeah. For lewds you want 512x768 and up.

Jimwalrus great job discovering this master tweak!

PS Prompts inside the first file.
 
  • Like
  • Red Heart
  • Love
Reactions: shadowlord88, Souras, yomimmo and 1 other person
Jimwalrus

Jimwalrus

Active Member
Sep 15, 2021
891
3,287
Sepheyer said:
Check out this post with stunning artwork by Jimwalrus : link

It got me thinking and tweaking. First, the motivating bit:

View attachment 2359883

Second, the real question: to what extent the image height parameter affects the entire image?

Well, let's find out. Here are a bunch of tests using same prompt but different image sizes:
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
512x513 - doesn't exist, as the render defaults to 512x512, it just ignores "512x513" command.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
So, yeah. For lewds you want 512x768 and up.

Jimwalrus great job discovering this master tweak!

PS Prompts inside the first file.
Click to expand...
Damn you, I was about to do a post on this very subject. Fortunately I'd not actually done any work on it, so no time wasted! ;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sepheyer
Jimwalrus

Jimwalrus

Active Member
Sep 15, 2021
891
3,287
Sepheyer said:
Check out this post with stunning artwork by Jimwalrus : link

It got me thinking and tweaking. First, the motivating bit:

View attachment 2359883

Second, the real question: to what extent the image height parameter affects the entire image?

Well, let's find out. Here are a bunch of tests using same prompt but different image sizes:
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
512x513 - doesn't exist, as the render defaults to 512x512, it just ignores "512x513" command.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
So, yeah. For lewds you want 512x768 and up.

Jimwalrus great job discovering this master tweak!

PS Prompts inside the first file.
Click to expand...
BTW, I've discovered it generates fewer eldritch horrors if you don't have multiples of 512 - presumably SD chops those up into separate diffusions and stitches them back together (very, very rough analogy!), thus causing more two bodies, three legs etc.
So take it down (or up if you must) by 64 pixels in one direction. Haven't tested the effects of changing both yet.

In short, 960x512 generates more human results than 1024x512
 
  • Red Heart
Reactions: yomimmo and Sepheyer
Sepheyer

Sepheyer

Well-Known Member
Dec 21, 2020
1,527
3,597
Elefy said:
View attachment 2359948

And I have something fucked in my automatic1111, its installed on 17.11.22,but auto update ,hmmm. Its time for second fresh copy :D

Are you using xformers?
Code: 
No module 'xformers'. Proceeding without it.
Click to expand...
Here is my "webui-user.bat" to enable xformers:
Code: 
git pull
@echo off

set PYTHON=
set GIT=
set VENV_DIR=
set COMMANDLINE_ARGS=--xformers --opt-split-attention

call webui.bat
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jimwalrus
Elefy

Elefy

Member
Jan 4, 2022
233
867
I have 3060Ti 8GB and read that it dont need xformers and it is for weaker GPU/VRAM
Now installing fresh copy and will see :D
.... installed and same result, then add
--xformers --opt-split-attention

render this:

00011-207294298.png

Have difference from Jimwalrus one, but :D


00138-207294298-gorgeous_woman_from_Brazil._plus_size_model._narrow_shoulders._DD_size_sagging...png

Game "spot the difference"
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: yomimmo, Sepheyer and Jimwalrus
Sepheyer

Sepheyer

Well-Known Member
Dec 21, 2020
1,527
3,597
Changing height challenges a few of my earlier believes. What I now see:

- Changes the pose sets. Suddenly I am seeing poses I never saw before.
- Changes the focal length of the lens. Suddenly I am seeing pronounced 20mm to 35mm focal length. This corresponds to the human vision equivalents.
- Seeing a lot of feet. This is rather unexpected. I thought you can get feet from 512x512 by asking for "feet", but you really can't, not as easily as from 512x1024.

Clearly, we gonna be needing to adjust prompts for working with larger sets.

00006-1940892402-playboy centerfold style.__gorgeous woman from Russia._plus size model._narro...png
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
 
Last edited:
  • Red Heart
  • Like
Reactions: yomimmo and Jimwalrus
Jimwalrus

Jimwalrus

Active Member
Sep 15, 2021
891
3,287
Sepheyer said:
Changing height challenges a few of my earlier believes. What I now see:

- Changes the pose sets. Suddenly I am seeing poses I never saw before.
- Changes the focal length of the lens. Suddenly I am seeing pronounced 20mm to 35mm focal length. This corresponds to the human vision equivalents.
- Seeing a lot of feet. This is rather unexpected. I thought you can get feet from 512x512 by asking for "feet", but you really can't, not as easily as from 512x1024.

Clearly, we gonna be needing to adjust prompts for working with larger sets.

View attachment 2360045
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
Click to expand...
When all's said and done, humans aren't 1:1 ratio.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sepheyer
Sepheyer

Sepheyer

Well-Known Member
Dec 21, 2020
1,527
3,597
The secret to the laying poses. Gents, we just fucking cracked the Enigma.

Looks like you want the pose to align with WxH dimensions. Standing needs Wx2H, laying you want 2WxH.

Please excise the defects, since the prompt still has the "pose standing" in it:
00015-1940892402-playboy centerfold style.__gorgeous woman from Russia._plus size model._narro...png
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
 
  • Love
  • Like
Reactions: Elefy, Mr-Fox and Jimwalrus
Sepheyer

Sepheyer

Well-Known Member
Dec 21, 2020
1,527
3,597
...but I don't really want the dude, so adding this to the negative prompt:
Code: 
((((((male))), (((guy))), (((dude))), (((boy))), (((man)))))).
00031-1836225617-full body HOT 18 year old adriana chechik with huge breast, abs, ((school gir...png
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Elefy and Jimwalrus
fr34ky

fr34ky

Active Member
Oct 29, 2017
812
2,167
Sepheyer said:
The secret to the laying poses. Gents, we just fucking cracked the Enigma.

Looks like you want the pose to align with WxH dimensions. Standing needs Wx2H, laying you want 2WxH.

Please excise the defects, since the prompt still has the "pose standing" in it:
View attachment 2360092
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
Click to expand...
This mostly deppends on the model, you can get laying position in vertical pictures with some models. With most models you'll only get anatomically incorrect laying poses tho.
I'm not sure, but I think the guys that made the models keep training them so in the future most popular models like PFG will have this problems solved. I know I've repeated the word models too many times but... models.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: Mr-Fox, Jimwalrus and Sepheyer
Sepheyer

Sepheyer

Well-Known Member
Dec 21, 2020
1,527
3,597
Are Commas and Periods The Same?

They are kinda very close, but not exactly the same. What really matters is not having them at all.

Testing this:
00326-3014654993-ultrarealistic photography, playboy centerfold style, 4k, 8k, 16k, gtx, 135mm...png
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
But I change the symbols as follows:
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
 
  • Love
  • Like
  • Hey there
Reactions: DD3DD, Heinzmonkey, Mr-Fox and 1 other person
Mr-Fox

Mr-Fox

Well-Known Member
Jan 24, 2020
1,401
3,793
jackhampper said:
Anyone know prompts ? View attachment 2364989
Click to expand...
Not when the file type is changed. This guy clearly doesn't want to share his findings with the community. With a new technology like this, there will be a lot of opportunists and grifters who try to cash in on it. Just look at all the websites popping up, selling "pro " versions of Stable Diffuse embed on their sites. A lot of people who have a bit off computer "dyslexia" will fall for this. And people will also try to cash in on their "art". Just like this guy probably.
Perhaps you could make the argument that creating very good and professional looking stock photos for ads could be a legit business, but i'm not so sure how I feel about this kind of content.
I mean think of all the OF Thots... Will no one think of the Thots..:LOL:
 
Last edited:
  • Love
  • Haha
Reactions: Jimwalrus and Sepheyer
Mr-Fox

Mr-Fox

Well-Known Member
Jan 24, 2020
1,401
3,793
Apparently Selena saw this new trend and decides this is some "major BS!". The unrealistic objectification is the patriarchy, clearly!.. So as a manifestation she threw caution to the wind and said
" I'll show em what a real woman looks like. "
" Have a look at this ya misogynistic bigots!.. " :LOL:

[MrFoxxx] Selena.png

" Bravo! Stunning and brave.!.. " :p

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: Honey Tales, LK1924, zenzaxaznez and 3 others
Sepheyer

Sepheyer

Well-Known Member
Dec 21, 2020
1,527
3,597
Switched the sampler to "Heun" from "Euler A" (thanks to Mr-Fox!). Probably the easiest way to change the style of whatever it is you have been generating. Heun takes twice as long as EulerA.

But the change produces subtle-ass changes that go a long way. Works really nice on some sets, and somewhat unusable on others.
00012-3657192363-gorgeous woman from Brazil._plus size model._narrow shoulders._DD size saggin...png
Prompt inside.
 
  • Love
  • Like
Reactions: botc76, Jimwalrus and Mr-Fox
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom