- Dec 23, 2018
- 608
- 2,555
Ah yes, the Church of the Overhead Powerlines
- Sep 26, 2018
- 3,131
- 3,196
I have been trying to install xformer for while a and no luck I have follow all instruction from text and video
Stable Diffusion AUTOMATIC1111 = hard to install, I have tried to put into extensions didn't work
Stable Diffusion Automatic = just have to put xformer into extensions and it installed fine
- Jan 24, 2020
- 1,401
- 3,803
- Jan 24, 2020
- 1,401
- 3,803
No need to install anything at least not for Auto1111. Just open webui-user.bat with notepad and add the argument like so:
"set COMMANDLINE_ARGS= --xformers" and save. Then start webui-user.bat , done.
- Jan 24, 2020
- 1,401
- 3,803
I wanted to have a go too, but went in a slightly different direction..So here was this mornings exercise.
The model used was Hyper V1 -You must be registered to see the links
So I saw this picture and thought I would do something with it :-You must be registered to see the links
It uses the prompt -
award winning photo, extremely detailed, amazing, fine detail, highly detailed woman, (extremely detailed eyes and face), full body, large breasts, (blue jeans), fitness, short blond hair, (stripes, belts), by Frank Cho and Terry Dodson, wrist watch, (dark alley, dark night), (white croptop),
Trying the exact same prompt but using the Hyper model gave me this :-
View attachment 2562637
So then I decided to take out the 'by Frank and Terry' part. Prompt now was award winning full body photo, extremely detailed, amazing, fine detail, highly detailed woman, (extremely detailed eyes and face), full body, large breasts, (white croptop), (blue jeans), fitness, short blond hair, (stripes, belts), wrist watch, (dark alley, dark night),
View attachment 2562639
I wasn't really liking the jeans so decided on miniskirt instead and decided to bling it up and change the dimensions to try and get full body shots. Prompt changed to :- award winning full body photo, extremely detailed, amazing, fine detail, highly detailed woman, (extremely detailed eyes and face), full body, large breasts, (intricate croptop), (intricate miniskirt), fitness, short blond hair, intricate jewelery, wrist watch, (dark alley, dark night)
View attachment 2562644
Lets get rid of the alleyway and try a fashion catwalk. Prompt now is :- award winning full body photo, extremely detailed, amazing, fine detail, highly detailed woman, (catwalk), (extremely detailed eyes and face), strong jaw, high cheekbones, full body, large breasts, (intricate transparent croptop), (intricate miniskirt), fitness, short blond hair, intricate jewelery
View attachment 2562646
Got a bit lucky with the background girl as A. I didn't prompt for her and B. She doesn't look like a monster, even has 5 fingers!
So that was my morning while hard at work
Rule 1 : No safeword!
Rule 2 : No crying!
Rule 3 : Scream all you want no one can hear you.
ok let's begin
- Jan 24, 2020
- 1,401
- 3,803
At the strippclub
I had some color bleed but it still looks good though.
I had some color bleed but it still looks good though.
- Aug 4, 2020
- 2,569
- 3,303
if you can't see a place where the volume is set, you can probably just rerender the .mp3 file with a lower volume in something like Handbrake, Vegas 13, Da Vinci Resolve etc
- Jun 4, 2022
- 170
- 73
Yes, btw using online services is faster like
You must be registered to see the links
dont know whats going on. but now all my images look like this. no matter what model i use. no mater what settings i use, they all end up like this. looks like HDR overkill. perhaps a setting in main got messed up. no idea. got all these nicely created girls etc. but the overall is this ugly result.
Last edited:
i found this easy to install various version of SD (no idea if yall already knew about it):
You must be registered to see the links
- Jan 24, 2020
- 1,401
- 3,803
When you get strange result like this, reboot everything and try again.
Just a guess, it could be that you used an embedding or hypernetwork and it is somehow lingering and breaking the prompt.
I have experienced this kind of issues also and it's the reason I stay clear of embeddings and hypernetworks most of the time.
In my experience they have a too large tendency to break things.
When I hade my issues it was like the cash or something related to memory hade been "clogged" by these type of injections and I had to restart and generate a bunch of throw away images to clear it out.
I could see it become less and less messed up when it finally "let go".
In your case maybe it was something else entirely, idk. That's SD for ya..
I see that you are using Unspeakable-Horrors embedding (TI). Try remove it and generate again.
Last edited:
- Sep 26, 2018
- 3,131
- 3,196
I have notice that too when I put CFG Scale or Sampling steps is up to high
- Jan 4, 2022
- 239
- 923
Looks like hi CFG scale (but your PNG info show CFG 7)
this is CFG 30
and this is CFG 5
Or something is overdo here:
Code:
Model: NSFW-Style_chilloutmix_NiPrunedFp32Fix, ENSD: 31337, NPW_weight: 1.4, AddNet Enabled: True,
AddNet Module 1: LoRA, AddNet Model 1: accidentalExposure_v10(6f7b8fdc6491), AddNet Weight A 1: 0.85,
AddNet Weight B 1: 0.85
Last edited:
- Aug 4, 2020
- 2,569
- 3,303
- Jan 4, 2022
- 239
- 923
- Jan 24, 2020
- 1,401
- 3,803
Liquids in SD.. No bueno..
- Nov 12, 2017
- 429
- 3,493
Hi, for those interested in training their own TI's, the tutorial by BelieveDiffusion is now available again:
You must be registered to see the links