- Jul 31, 2017
- 1,311
- 2,591
Honestly, best case scenario is that they only need to modify the games to remain in Patreon, since it says nothing about animation and animated content or erotic art (actually, if you could get me erotic art from patreon that isn't banned due to differences in terminology, you could be absolutely safe and disguise it as art or use said term to cover your work, but this could only work with non live action games). Worst case scenario, is that the Guidelines are changed to include them.This is being debated in the thread opened to discuss this issue. At first, I understood it to be related to webcam content and other real porn activities that I saw take place on or through some patreon accounts.
Strictly speaking, "using Patreon to raise funds in order to produce pornographic material" is the very definition of what game developers are doing there, despite the legal loops that, as you say, can be employed to argue a case. But, curiously enough, games are not explicitly mentioned in the text, and some of the creator pages that were taken down seem to be up again. I have even read some are saying they are handling things with Patreon and will be back with some changes (problematic content hidden under patreon-only posts, etc.). Therefore, if the policy affected the activity in its totality, this should not be possible and all the developers should have to change their projects radically, or remove them from Patreon.
Let's see if they clarify things in the next days, but, as of now, I doubt they change is so radical.
I would still argue that since there is no commercial transaction (as defined by law and merchant custom), the part in which they argue that "you cannot sell pornographic material" does not apply to the developers at all. Since this isn't a sell, this is a donation. And a difference in terms as those, could in theory keep you relatively safe.
Last edited: