- Jul 28, 2023
- 156
- 359
And those that have soul don't have the resources to start XDtruly the only kind of people that make sex games are those that have no souls
And those that have soul don't have the resources to start XDtruly the only kind of people that make sex games are those that have no souls
Well, unless we write lies in the review section, it becomes impossible to describe the real aspects that make this game unplayable.Almost none of the 1 star reviews that I have seen posted, even though they are completely fair, are not objective.
Most of them have been about the creator/dev, the update time and not the game.
Did your review follow the rules?
Review Rules
- Try to be objective, describe your reasoning and highlight what key aspects of the content were good or bad.
- Do not mention games from other developers in your review, this is to prevent cross promotion.
- The review should only be about the game, not the developer (pricing, update times, etc).
- There is a 200 character requirement, do not attempt to bypass this by using spam or irrelevant comments. Do not mention or comment on the 200 character limit, this is not the place to complain about forum rules.
- Your review shouldn't be solely focused on your feelings about a specific genre or detail of the game.
- Do not review your own game or games you've worked on.
- Must be in English, as stated in General Rules 1 - 5. Exception is translation threads.
No it doesn't far from it.Well, unless we write lies in the review section, it becomes impossible to describe the real aspects that make this game unplayable.
Have you checked all these 5 star reviews with the same scrutiny?Almost none of the 1 star reviews that I have seen posted, even though they are completely fair, are not objective.
Most of them have been about the creator/dev, the update time and not the game.
Did your review follow the rules?
Review Rules
- Try to be objective, describe your reasoning and highlight what key aspects of the content were good or bad.
- Do not mention games from other developers in your review, this is to prevent cross promotion.
- The review should only be about the game, not the developer (pricing, update times, etc).
- There is a 200 character requirement, do not attempt to bypass this by using spam or irrelevant comments. Do not mention or comment on the 200 character limit, this is not the place to complain about forum rules.
- Your review shouldn't be solely focused on your feelings about a specific genre or detail of the game.
- Do not review your own game or games you've worked on.
- Must be in English, as stated in General Rules 1 - 5. Exception is translation threads.
I think the biggest problem here (besides of course scamm and money laundering) is the fact that this isn't even called a remake or reboot by DC, he called it tech-UPDATE and even put it as version 0.21.0 , as if something new had been introduced to the game, but in reality the game is being remade.DC is not the first con man.. oops i mean con dev.. ( damn) i mean dev to pull stuff like this on patrons, there have been many in the past and some doing so presently.
Remake is not always a bad thing, some have done it in good time and made their project better. Many have done it because they want to put it on steam and have to change content ( neutering the adult content or censoring ).
There are good devs and bad devs, If it wasn't clear and obvious before in regards to Dark Connie and what he is. It certainly should be now, the gullible patrons well who cares most of them can't be fixed. They are stuck in a " Hey it's DC, he would never do anything wrong" mind set.
For most on this site now, well we have the extent of the con.. It ain't gonna get better.
That has nothing to do with what I wrote.Have you checked all these 5 star reviews with the same scrutiny?
Oh, you haven't?
So please see yourself out.
Thank you.
what's your problem man? Did you happen to stop and read these 1 and 2 star reviews? These are literally reviews from people saying that all content was lost after this pseudo-update, what's your argument for saying that I'm playing the victim? Do yourself and others in this thread a favor, and stop acting like a DC donor.No it doesn't far from it.
There are several 1-2 star reviews that has not been removed.
Stop playing the victim card.
Yes I read them.what's your problem man? Did you happen to stop and read these 1 and 2 star reviews? These are literally reviews from people saying that all content was lost after this pseudo-update, what's your argument for saying that I'm playing the victim? Do yourself and others in this thread a favor, and stop acting like a DC donor.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
in many ways it looks worse. some backgrounds are very detailed with lots of characters, which is no wonder if you have two years just to draw but them that also gives the backgrounds that aren't as good a uncanny cheap feeling especially in the new aspect ratio.I don't personally see any major improvements either
The criteria should be updated because that shit is relevant to the quality of the game. It sums up what you can expect.If that is the only thing you wrote it doesn't fulfill the criteria/rules, so that could be the reason it was removed.