- Sep 30, 2021
- 80
- 72
People are mad,why do you care?Wtf is it with the sudden review bombing?
There isn't a review bombing.Wtf is it with the sudden review bombing?
Dev has been milking his patrons for years now, released an update with about 98% of the content removed in exchange for about 1 new scene and a couple old scenes slightly cleaned up.Wtf is it with the sudden review bombing?
no, well it might be, but another user here looked into it, all the old art is still there but not usable so that is the reason why it has it's size.funny thing, this 'release' has 1.2 GB, almost EXACTLY as the previous one. With only 10% content. Oh man, their code must be a mess.
You don't optimize for size early on, that comes later when everything is done, size is basically only relevant for mobile these days. If anything STS is lightweight because it reuses a ton of stuff.funny thing, this 'release' has 1.2 GB, almost EXACTLY as the previous one. With only 10% content. Oh man, their code must be a mess.
No they don't, the reviews that follows the rules get to stay, there are plenty that are still there.
This has been discussed at length now.
While the 5 star reviews are weirdly positive they appear to live up to what a review here demands.
If people writing 1-2 star reviews took a little more time describing why the game is bad instead of just sayin dev bad, they would stay.
Is so weird because in the Luna in tavern thread they allow people talking shit about the devs scummy behaviour.Idk about others, but my review said the game has been in development for 8 years, and now had barely any content, so I was recommending not to play it. Mod tanked it, without citing any rule I had broken.
I do think that talking about the dev's poor behavior should have it's place in a review tho, but that's just me.
I mean, if DC was doing something provably malicious, they might allow it, but as it stands its all just hearsay and conjecture.Idk about others, but my review said the game has been in development for 8 years, and now had barely any content, so I was recommending not to play it. Mod tanked it, without citing any rule I had broken.
I do think that talking about the dev's poor behavior should have it's place in a review tho, but that's just me.
My guess would be different mods reading the rules differently.Is so weird because in the Luna in tavern thread they allow people talking shit about the devs scummy behaviour.
Why is not allowed here?
It should, in part.Idk about others, but my review said the game has been in development for 8 years, and now had barely any content, so I was recommending not to play it. Mod tanked it, without citing any rule I had broken.
I do think that talking about the dev's poor behavior should have it's place in a review tho, but that's just me.
this is like the 10th 'tech update'so instead of update, we have a start over...
You sorry fool !maybe because I was already expecting it, but I kinda liked this tech update build, looks way better and art is way more consistent. And well, if a start over is what we get, the least DC can do is make these updates to be more frequent, it's the bare minimum.
War. Good god, ya'all.Review war begins.