Ryuukun

Newbie
Jan 18, 2018
90
168
No they don't, the reviews that follows the rules get to stay, there are plenty that are still there.
This has been discussed at length now.

While the 5 star reviews are weirdly positive they appear to live up to what a review here demands.
If people writing 1-2 star reviews took a little more time describing why the game is bad instead of just sayin dev bad, they would stay.

Idk about others, but my review said the game has been in development for 8 years, and now had barely any content, so I was recommending not to play it. Mod tanked it, without citing any rule I had broken.

I do think that talking about the dev's poor behavior should have it's place in a review tho, but that's just me.
 

Xupuzulla

Engaged Member
Aug 1, 2022
2,352
7,749
Idk about others, but my review said the game has been in development for 8 years, and now had barely any content, so I was recommending not to play it. Mod tanked it, without citing any rule I had broken.

I do think that talking about the dev's poor behavior should have it's place in a review tho, but that's just me.
Is so weird because in the Luna in tavern thread they allow people talking shit about the devs scummy behaviour.
Why is not allowed here?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fayrus

CUNTBLAZER420

Member
Jan 24, 2020
240
609
Idk about others, but my review said the game has been in development for 8 years, and now had barely any content, so I was recommending not to play it. Mod tanked it, without citing any rule I had broken.

I do think that talking about the dev's poor behavior should have it's place in a review tho, but that's just me.
I mean, if DC was doing something provably malicious, they might allow it, but as it stands its all just hearsay and conjecture.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Logan3000x

beryn

Member
May 8, 2017
444
249
Is so weird because in the Luna in tavern thread they allow people talking shit about the devs scummy behaviour.
Why is not allowed here?
My guess would be different mods reading the rules differently.
That is a problem though.

Idk about others, but my review said the game has been in development for 8 years, and now had barely any content, so I was recommending not to play it. Mod tanked it, without citing any rule I had broken.

I do think that talking about the dev's poor behavior should have it's place in a review tho, but that's just me.
It should, in part.
I believe that it is possible to both mention that and then also review the game and the state it is in.
there are plenty to go after in both the 20.16 version and the new one.
So my take as I have mentioned to others is, review the game for what it is and mention the dev and how he negatively impacts it.
 

-R1ck-

Member
Apr 7, 2024
164
321
maybe because I was already expecting it, but I kinda liked this tech update build, looks way better and art is way more consistent. And well, if a start over is what we get, the least DC can do is make these updates to be more frequent, it's the bare minimum.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Kay_Kay and lo0u

Zeyla

Member
Mar 1, 2018
476
649
maybe because I was already expecting it, but I kinda liked this tech update build, looks way better and art is way more consistent. And well, if a start over is what we get, the least DC can do is make these updates to be more frequent, it's the bare minimum.
You sorry fool !
 
  • Like
Reactions: Logi23

Mad Martigan

Newbie
Nov 23, 2017
27
52
i was wondering what happend to this game, so they decided to restart.
did they learn a thing or 2 from 'lust and power'
it was allready super annoying that their saves never worked
then they remade it basicly, and now they remake it again
 
  • Like
Reactions: Connie W
4.00 star(s) 388 Votes