My point is it's likely people didn't even value the content when it was there considering the people that paid for it (when they voted for more) kept voting for the same 20% of content. So the fact that most of the content people were uninterrested in disappeared but thats one of the main hooks to your argument seems weird to me. Why do you care?
By that logic development of the game could've stopped 6 years ago and there's no need for further updates cause everything you assume people ever cared about is already there. The only possible improvement would be to discard the rest of the game and start a spin-off focusing exclusively on those 20% of content, whatever they may be.
It's a bit of a non-argument and we both know it, but that's fine since we're just arguing for the sake of arguing at this point.
But as for your 2nd paragraph, thats my point. you're pretending to be assmad and your reason is because its fun. Can't argue with that dude. It took a really long time and we kinda have to start from scratch cuz thats what happens when a person who has never coded before makes a game with massive feature creep.
I didn't pretend to be
assmad, the most I can muster is some level of surprise that the tech update turned out to be significantly worse than even the most rabid doomsayers predicted.
As for starting from scratch, wasn't that what the tech update was supposed to do 2 years ago? I thought that was the whole excuse for all the lack of new content in the meantime.
Be that as it may, you seem to find my faux outrage as amusing as I find your willingness to defend even the most feeble excuses for underdelivering on the devs part.
We're obviously not going to convince each other and if you're honestly satisfied with the state of the game and the progress of development then good for you I guess.
Enjoy the rest of your day.
