Built like Takagi-sanTiffany coming in with the Biig Forehead in this Teaser like
View attachment 3727864
No lewd content, just some cosplay costume stuff at the festival in the park. No, Ryoko is not Toy.I have a question, actually two. This is kind of a spoiler, not really. So I played this game years ago and my first question is: has Ryoko gotten content since then? I remember she used to pop up here and there with no sexual content and it was kind of frustrating because I liked her design a lot. It also seemed that the story was hinting that she was Toy, which I disliked, I just wanted to check if any of that has changed or been revealed. I know back then there was also discussion that Toy was actually the girl at the very start in the smoking area.
The most "on model" art released in recent months for the women, nice. Though MC looks off.
I always thought Tiffany had a male-pattern receding hairline... this confirms. ROFLMAOTiffany coming in with the Biig Forehead in this Teaser like
View attachment 3727864
A much better preview, although it looks like they pasted their heads onto the AI generated image, its still much more in line with their actual look. I can only hope that Uber develops some sort of method to make sure the generated images actually look like the game we know. Looking forward to the added Tiffany and Mary routes.
HELL YEAH!
At least Mary looks good. Based on recently AI shit , its good enough for me.
ah damn it, well thanks for letting me know about they toy situation, still frustrated ryoko doesn’t have any lewd content after like five years.No lewd content, just some cosplay costume stuff at the festival in the park. No, Ryoko is not Toy.
The most "on model" art released in recent months for the women, nice. Though MC looks off.
I always thought Tiffany had a male-pattern receding hairline... this confirms. ROFLMAO
She's doesn't even look like Mary.
Can you guys not see the night and day difference between the AI face of Mary & Peter as compared to original ?
Holy shit I'm glad I stopped my support, MC looks so dumb
It looks fine to me. I see your point on the freckles, if I were uber I’d add freckles externally, but mary looks close enough. Then again, me personally I spend more time reading the dialogue than looking at the art. As long as there’s enough similarity, it’s fine for me. I mean at a glance I could tell who each character was.Can you guys not see the night and day difference between the AI face of Mary & Peter as compared to original ?
Is it just me ?
Uberpie got such huge support after he got kicked of Patreon, and this is the shit he delivers.
And who are these cuck Patreons who don't even ask for the bare minimum of touch-ups on the fuking FACEs and bodies of characters ?
I think the colors are chosen too brightly. The color scheme is very different from all the previous arts. I really like Peter and Tiffany's bodies, Tiffany's face looks like her face from seasons 1-4, but not like her face from season 5 (I don't know why I feel that way). I would have lowered Mary's eyes a bit lower so that they look at 1 point with Peter's eyes - in this position the eye is blocked by the pout of the glasses, which for me personally looks a bit weird. Peter's face okay. Mary's body is okay too. I also have a question about the girls' legs - they're either in tights or that light. Nice background.