This is a really interesting and stylistically original concept. Despite the fact that I don't care for some of the "attitudinal" (philosophical?) stuff...the objectification of and cursory treatment of the women and the whole lack of any kind of a romantic (human) atmosphere...to me it's a bit like watching animals interacting in a zoo I nevertheless find the originality and quirky, sort of whimsical atmosphere and approach to the subject matter excitingly refreshing.
Maybe I'm wrong but I don't feel I'm here to actually judge the subject matter itself and what is and isn't included in it. I feel I am here to assess the quality of the novel as told and the effectiveness of the way it is presented. Just because I may not like the subject-matter a whole lot, I don't see why I should penalise the creator in my Review. I mean why should his creation be damaged because he didn't put in (because he didn't want to) something I might have wanted him to put in, but that someone else might not have wanted to see in it? Damned if he does, damned if he doesn't. Don't mark down because you didn't like the story, because you don't agree with what he/she put in it, mark down because he/she didn't present or tell what they did want to tell very well, clearly or effectively. To apply the latter approach would be like saying you think Monty Python is rubbish because the humor's absurd, you don't like absurd humor and it would have been better if they'd put a bit of standup comedy in it. Disliking the story or selected content, in my perception, is what the Discussion part of this page seems to surely be for.
For me, the Review section should be to assess how well the story, as intended, has been presented and in this respect I find no fault whatsoever, in fact, the opposite. The story is highly intriguing, the rendering is spotless and consistently impeccable. The characters are wholly credible given the circumstances and conventions that dictate their actions, reactions and feelings. The dialogue conveys the nature and attitudes of its characters with the requisite degree of quirkiness yet, as I said, natural credibility, as befits the overwhelming atmosphere exuded by the environment as a whole.
So as I said whilst it's not really my kind of "thing", I do think that for its originality, its unconventionality, how conceivable it may be, the kind of story it attempts to tell and the way in which the whole novel is put together to entertain is immaculately and exceptionally well done. Totally laudable and easily, to me, meriting my five star rating.