Well, mainly because it isn't "just another game".Why do people get this upset over a game having furries in it and offhandedly suggesting they be removed? Did anyone consider maybe the game wasn't made with you in mind? There's thousands of games on this site, you can more than easily find one that suits you instead of passive-aggressively moaning about one game that doesn't cater to you.
"omg this game would be so perfect if theymade what I want instead of what they want to makeremoved <insert thing here>"
Why is it always gay/and or furry games that get this reaction? What ever happened to just ignoring things you don't like? Like, if you went into a game thread that had NTR stuff proudly displayed in it, you wouldn't go "damn I wish they removed the NTR" (actually, they probably do), you'd just hide the thread and move on. But people have different standards when it comes to gay games or furry games, passive-aggressively whining about how the game has great gameplay and graphics, but "oh I wish they stopped catering to their primary audience that they originally made the game for, and made games for me, instead. It would be really good if they did that, it's such a shame"
I don't care about furry visual novels and normal RPGs, but in this case it's a shame because it really is a unique game. There isn't really a non-furry game that's Necrodancer with big focus on bondage like this one. And furry-or-not-furry is aesthetic choice, NTR is a plot device, and while game could stay the same without furry content (or just changing it to cat/fox/whatever ears), if NTR has a big role, you you can't really remove it without hugely impacting the game.
And I'm not literally suggesting author should remove it, that would be way too much work. Just saying it is a shame, because a pretty unique experience is confined to pretty limited audience.
Last edited: