Come on dude. That's not how do this.
At the very least you should link to the proposal in question so people can make up their own opinions instead of yapping after some random youtuber.
So:
You must be registered to see the links
(it's from 2016 by the way)
I know it's a lot, but at least skim through it and don't base your opinion on what some dumbass on youtube says.
In other news. It's not as bad as , but still sucks.
And to quote someone who sums up the main complaint of the dude in the video pretty well:
This is about the enforcement of intellectual property copyrights, should the rightholder (aka. person who uploaded content) wish it.
It does not impact creative commons.
Unless someone goes through the trouble of registering their content under a copyright license, where it becomes their intellectual property.
WHICH IS, mind you, already a thing.
This article essentially says "in content-sharing sites produced by users, the site will cooperate with the creator to enforce their copyright laws should they wish it"
News sites are most definitely NOT "Information society service providers that store and provide to the public access to large amounts of works or other subject-matter uploaded by their users
It's obvious the dude did not really inform himself. While it is an issue, he has no clue what he's talking about.