I was about to take a look into it. Added to the weekly bs breaker, thanks for saving me the 20 minutes mate.
HTML The Fapocalypse [v0.3.5b] [FAP Online Creation]
- Thread starter FAP Online Creation
- Start date
Nah, the higher tiers are probably the team taking up some of that space in hopes it will create a FOMO.Don't forget about the whales.
I think he has a couple of fat whales in stock.
Also, pretty sad to see that their willingness to "give back to the community" went down a 660% this month. 212 dollars seems like a weird number to donate too.
Oh well.
Are you insane mate? Spending time in actual development instead of breaking shit down on purpose so people might feel more inclined to pay 10 bucks in order to avoid the grind?
And then what, testing before releasing? Planning a roadmap? Adding content that's not tied to arbitrary progressions in order to artificially lengthen the development so supporters can be milked?
Man, what crazy ideas you've got.
A friendly fellow already fixed that, but if we are being completely honest here, the crafting system breaking is almost an improvement to the game.
What an incredible community united by the love towards their game they are fostering.
That's quite the achievement.
It's extremely funny because some people are DMing me silly shenanigans these guys made in the past (At one point they even got confused and made a release with a different game), but something that stuck to me is how many people mentioned that they hardcoded the incest, which I believe is a big no-no in both Patreon and SubscribeStar.
Of course we all know of this issue (It just takes a quick look into the code or playing for 5 minutes before you realize the relationships are indeed hardcoded), but the fact that the prompt you see at the beginning telling you to define the relationship with the NPCs is bs made to give the illusionof compliance makes the situation very egregious.
They know their game is not compliant, and yet they decide to spend more time trying to bulletproof their code against bypasses instead of implementing a solution to a breach of ToS that could cut their funding off if looked into (Guess refactoring is not a term in their playbook).
I'm absolutely not trying to incite a pogrom against this creator (Truly, I don't want to incite a wave of reports). I'm just stating facts and how ridiculous their approach to the issue is in hopes they might finally rethink their approach to this whole situation.
I know it won't happen but hey, I guess after everything I still choose to believe there's good in everyone.
- Dec 2, 2022
- 204
- 482
Hey there dear friend!
That's right, we weren't very thorough about the variable of relationship decision at the start.
Since it seems to be displeasing you guys, we will be fixing that right away. (Not a hard fix as you know).
And for everyone's information, for the sexual content with the main girls [ROADMAP ALERT]:
1- In the game right now, there is already a couple of full blown sex scenes with all the main girls. Just not on the main/secondary scenes path.
2- The 0.3 releases are focus on the handjob stage, the 0.4 releases will be on the titsjob stage and focused on tits. The 0.5 on the blowjob stage (mouth based sex). and the 0.6 on the full sex/vaginal stage.
3- We are doing less and less updates per stage so the next stage will be coming sooner.
4- So yeah, the amount of content/scenes when we will be to the full sex stage will be very huge.
For the cracks, we sure hope you guys are still having a blast with it!
PS: I'd really like to see what other game did we release other than the Fapocalypse! I did not know!
-Your truly, FapMat
So, I'm playing in cellphone and I have a problem.
Whenever I win a battle with those crazed woman, I can't reclaim the rewards and lock myself, what can I do?
Whenever I win a battle with those crazed woman, I can't reclaim the rewards and lock myself, what can I do?
- Jun 18, 2018
- 234
- 487
idk but im a dev that actually releases content and tests it first(just like im SURE they tested the grinding) fuck me for having integrity unlike these devs. right?
Hey there dear..... dear!
I think you didn't truly spoke your mind, so I hired a translator to actually elaborate on your statements:
"I was too inexperienced with development when I started, didn't read the ToS of the platforms I would use for economical support and once I realized the potential harm of the situation I was too lazy to tackle the actual issue of going through the current 1500 or so references to "aunt, cousin, nephew, daughter, father, mother, son, brother, sister" to replace them for variables that the user decide and instead applied a patch that gives the illusion of compliance and called it a day instead.
Worry not! I'll work on this out of the growing discontent of the users, not out of fear the game will get gunned down for not adhering to the ToS. And as you know, this is a very easy change (Sure thing it is at this point, mate). I'll simply use a RegEx on notepad++ and hit "replace all"/make a quick Python script to replace 'aunt' for 'relationAunt'/feed the text to Chatgpt so it replaces it for me. I'm sure this will work perfectly and won't introduce several hundred bugs in the process that we'll either take a couple years to fix or not fix at all!
"(Quick reminder that roadmaps WITHOUT dates don't tell anything).
"Here's how we plan to slowly drag development over the next years. It only took us 1 year to "refactor" the previous code up to 0.3, where it was, so you can expect 0.4 by 25Q4, 0.5 by 26Q2 and 0.6 by 2028. Expect delays however! We are doing less and less updates per stage because trying to proof the game takes time, so it's very hard for us 4 to put up any amount of content together
.""We still plan on spending more time trying to prevent bypasses instead of focusing on development and creating a product people would actually be willing to pay for!
"Fact check: Fapnation and Fapocalypse are not actually related.
I don't know either, dear dear, I'm not in charge of your releases. I got this image on my DMs and shared the message, like I did with the observations about hardcoded incest.
Cheers guys, see y'all next week.
Last edited:
Got fact checked by a mate that kindly let me know Fapnation isn't actually related to Fapocalypse.
Although I certainly can see how one could get mistaken by that, I do owe an apology for going with bias confirmation instead of fact checking the things I receive myself.
Whoops!
- Dec 2, 2022
- 204
- 482
Oh come on, such bad faith...
First,
$[characters.list.lana.player_role]
$[characters.list.lana.role]
Not just replace all names.
Second,
Doing less and less updates per stage means the content and sexual stages will be coming way faster you goof.
Third,
Huh, really? FapNation? It seems you are running out of creativity...
Anyway, to us, you took a couple of step back and are looking like this right now:
- Dec 2, 2022
- 204
- 482
Attempt 3 of speedrunning (currently set to when Angela is maxed out), no cheats. Day 218. Probably going to try again to get a sub 200 day win.
My oh my!! Quite a lot to unpack here, right?
And will this also take care of all other incest references that are not tied to the role of the character in the other passages, huh?
Also. It's possible that you made a typo (It's ok, it happens.) and, instead of saying "Not just replace all names." you meant "Now just replace all names.".
If you meant the second one, I truly think you are not even half aware of how much manual work you'll need to do to fix all the shenanigans that will come out of doing a wild search and replace or how much manual work you'll need to do before you can start replacing stuff.
Out of pure good will, and not trying to discredit your statement, just elaborating on what I actually meant before, I'll give you some considerations:
Doing a wild find and replace of "cousin" will either assign the role of Mia to the user or the role of the user to Mia.
Doing a wild find and replace of "aunt" will fuck up many passages, as there are more words that have those letters. You could, of course, be smart about it and search " aunt " instead of "aunt", but you'll still have to search for individual cases where the character is addressed differently like, for example "auntie".
Same thing would happen with "mom" and "moment", for example. And so on and so forth with all the other issues.
If you were to ask me, properly replacing this (Which means going through a passage at a time) and some basic testing that everything adheres to compliance (Which you probably wouldn't do anyways, but wishful thinking is the bane of me) should be up to 6/8 hours of work.
Sure thing, it's not hard. Just very tedious, and we all know how much you guys struggle with tedious shit, like making sure every file extension is the correct one! (Guess you couldn't find a script that checks if every file extension is a .webp on github yet, or that writing a script like this is too high level for you. Want me to write it for you?).
Oh my, isn't this delicious.
We all saw already you don't quite have the maturity or the guts to admit when you are wrong. And don't be ashamed that this is not something in your playbook, not everyone is capable of self-reflecting, it's fine. But the fact that you are trying to laugh at me for being able to do such a thing is quite pathetic, and speaks even more volumes about your character.
I'll be honest, if that's the worst flaw you can point on me, you are really grasping at straws here, and I'm truly flattered about it.
Again I understand that what I did must be akin to insanity to you. I could have, you know, deleted the post, edited it or call it a day and never address the whole thing, like you did when you tried to put the fault of the false positive your game was giving on me, which later you had to push a fix for it and, like a little bitch, never addressed.
Fuck, I could have put the blame on the guy who send me that shit, or even try to conjure some wild conspiracy and argue that, seeing how prepared you were to jump on this, it was one of you guys actually trying to bait me to "get one up on me" (And honestly, it's quite likely that at least one of the people I told about how your "security" worked after they asked me how I bypassed it was part of your team. Same shit with the fake reviews and the 1 star ones getting taken down, I guess).
Instead, as soon as I was corrected, I admitted I was wrong and made sure everyone could see it because I think it's the fair thing to do.
Now tell, my man, how in the fuck is manning up to your mistakes akin to being a crybaby? Because again, as much as I'm laughing my ass off at you right now, I'm deeply interested on seeing how you came to that conclusion.
Probably so that I can laugh even more.
Now, enough fun for today. Best regards and see you next time!
So, you mean to tell me that all the incest is not actually hardcoded into the passages, it's just that you are so lazy that, even though you already have a function to produce all the SugarCube passages so your game adheres to Patreon and SubscribeStar ToS, decided to not implement the last, easy step, because...? Why again? Because, as we both know, this ain't working at the moment.
And will this also take care of all other incest references that are not tied to the role of the character in the other passages, huh?
Also. It's possible that you made a typo (It's ok, it happens.) and, instead of saying "Not just replace all names." you meant "Now just replace all names.".
If you meant the second one, I truly think you are not even half aware of how much manual work you'll need to do to fix all the shenanigans that will come out of doing a wild search and replace or how much manual work you'll need to do before you can start replacing stuff.
Out of pure good will, and not trying to discredit your statement, just elaborating on what I actually meant before, I'll give you some considerations:
Doing a wild find and replace of "sister" for either Lana role or Elfie role will leave the other sister with no role being used.
Doing a wild find and replace of "cousin" will either assign the role of Mia to the user or the role of the user to Mia.
Doing a wild find and replace of "aunt" will fuck up many passages, as there are more words that have those letters. You could, of course, be smart about it and search " aunt " instead of "aunt", but you'll still have to search for individual cases where the character is addressed differently like, for example "auntie".
Same thing would happen with "mom" and "moment", for example. And so on and so forth with all the other issues.
If you were to ask me, properly replacing this (Which means going through a passage at a time) and some basic testing that everything adheres to compliance (Which you probably wouldn't do anyways, but wishful thinking is the bane of me) should be up to 6/8 hours of work.
Sure thing, it's not hard. Just very tedious, and we all know how much you guys struggle with tedious shit, like making sure every file extension is the correct one! (Guess you couldn't find a script that checks if every file extension is a .webp on github yet, or that writing a script like this is too high level for you. Want me to write it for you?).
Now, really? Please do explain to me how moving from an agile-esque methodology based on fast releases, on which you depend heavily in order to get feedback from users and fix the fuckton of bugs you introduce at each step, back to a waterfall model will improve your workflow. I'm really interested on your thoughts on the matter.
Oh my, isn't this delicious.
We all saw already you don't quite have the maturity or the guts to admit when you are wrong. And don't be ashamed that this is not something in your playbook, not everyone is capable of self-reflecting, it's fine. But the fact that you are trying to laugh at me for being able to do such a thing is quite pathetic, and speaks even more volumes about your character.
I'll be honest, if that's the worst flaw you can point on me, you are really grasping at straws here, and I'm truly flattered about it.
Again I understand that what I did must be akin to insanity to you. I could have, you know, deleted the post, edited it or call it a day and never address the whole thing, like you did when you tried to put the fault of the false positive your game was giving on me, which later you had to push a fix for it and, like a little bitch, never addressed.
Fuck, I could have put the blame on the guy who send me that shit, or even try to conjure some wild conspiracy and argue that, seeing how prepared you were to jump on this, it was one of you guys actually trying to bait me to "get one up on me" (And honestly, it's quite likely that at least one of the people I told about how your "security" worked after they asked me how I bypassed it was part of your team. Same shit with the fake reviews and the 1 star ones getting taken down, I guess).
Instead, as soon as I was corrected, I admitted I was wrong and made sure everyone could see it because I think it's the fair thing to do.
Now tell, my man, how in the fuck is manning up to your mistakes akin to being a crybaby? Because again, as much as I'm laughing my ass off at you right now, I'm deeply interested on seeing how you came to that conclusion.
Probably so that I can laugh even more.
Now, enough fun for today. Best regards and see you next time!
PS: What the fuck does arguing you severely lack in business ethics and development skills, explaining why and giving concrete points about it, have to do with creativity? Again, truly interested about it.
Last edited:
- Dec 2, 2022
- 204
- 482
- Dec 2, 2022
- 204
- 482
What a magnificent answer. It pairs amazingly well with this comment I put in the md5 two updates ago, at the start of the month.Us, reading you yapping, three sentences in:
Deeply sorry guys. Again, my bad. You need me to use simpler words? Perhaps make you a little drawing with pretty pictures? Do you think you could manage that, or is it still too much?
You truly are a gift that keeps on giving <3
- Dec 2, 2022
- 204
- 482
Thank you.
This is way more readable!
Calling us a gift? Wow, you are such a good little people pleaser!
- Jun 18, 2018
- 234
- 487
Why so you can go review bomb it the same way you had fake reviews for this game?
no thanks.