i still ask, you have another explanation? because if a thing isn't say out of loud this doesn't make it unproven or wrong.
yes the thing is never state in the game, but every evidence we have about that matter make that interpretation valid.
if you think i'm wrong, feel free to explain why. after all i'm proven wrong a significative numbers of time in the past. and for sure I don't attack anyone only if he think i'm not right. but doing it without any proof or reasoning... well i tend to dismiss them.
Did i ever say you were guaranteed to be wrong? No. I only made the objectively true observation that nothing has been confirmed about why previous Lustlords all died, and that no theory can be confirmed with the information we have in 0.54
While I too think that a tower-created manisfestation like Ginasta is the most likely theory, it is not guaranteed.
It could happen because of a powerful and truly immortal tower walker seeking balance (perhaps the unknown walker on Arclent)
It could be because of the theory that Incubus Kings lose interest in immortality and the world as they "mellow" over the years, and let themselves die out of boredom or tiredness.
It could happen because anything can and will happen according to the "infinite monkey theorem", including a seemingly immortal Incubus King dying at some point in an almost infinite "wheel" of events.
It could happen because the game is no where near completed, and there are a lot of unanswered questions about the tower, that Sierra has yet to explain fully
Hell, it could even be an inconcisteny in the lore.
And while I have many doubts about any and all of these theories, they are still very much on the table. And I don't plan on parading around, like a stiff prick, claiming that my theory is an objective truth. Your arrogance will only make it more entertaining if it turns out that you missed the bullseye by a mile.
The dice haven't hit the table yet, and the game isn't completed