- Mar 23, 2018
- 214
- 252
Im not comparing Tales of Legendary Lust to the Last Sovereign.Tales of legendary lust is quite early in development, so talking about it and comparing TLS with it ?
There no forced NTR in the game, they are some options who are easy to spot and forget.
While this game is well-developed, with plenty of content.
As to Simon, not a young idiot but experienced ex-soldier, the story mesh with the characters lives and tie to…
By now they are present on three continents, while he don't want to be the leader, he has the lead role of the most powerful currently going immortal, err, goddess. Plenty to see as development goes. Also, it won't probably happen, but It's possible to morph one body, for Simon + Harem of course.
OK, that's fair. Has there been a recent break point that's significant? The reason I wait until after a chapter is done is so that I don't forget everything in progress.Chapters getting bigger and bigger each and every time, so you might as just play 5 up until it's completed.
We don't really know the long-term implications some of the decisions made during the latest Gathering (latest big event before the current one), I also have a save from that point I think or a bit later if I have to go back to do something somehow else, but that's pretty close to the current content.OK, that's fair. Has there been a recent break point that's significant? The reason I wait until after a chapter is done is so that I don't forget everything in progress.
the end of each stroy focused section can be a good break point. but some had significative cliffhanger.OK, that's fair. Has there been a recent break point that's significant? The reason I wait until after a chapter is done is so that I don't forget everything in progress.
I understand that you dont like NTR (me neither) but miss this gem of game just bc the 000000.01% of content that have NTR (is just text-based sex anyway) you are quite overreacting, no offense.So this is not a game for me sadly.
Yes. You get a bit more freedom later on, but he's generally in favor of stability and actively trying to unfuck things. You get to decide how effective he is, and depending on your decisions can be very unsuccessful in this endeavor.so I'm probably in the prologue still at the wagon part. Is simon the main character for the rest of the game? asking because I dont like him one bit.
Why are you trying to convince him to play a game that has content he's not interested in?I understand that you dont like NTR (me neither) but miss this gem of game just bc the 000000.01% of content that have NTR (is just text-based sex anyway) you are quite overreacting, no offense.
I dont like such content. Regardless how little it is. I would not have problem if it was avoidable. But we can not avoid the situations where some love interests/harem members fuck others be that for story reasons, helping the MC further his goals, the nature of some of the female characters or whatever.I understand that you dont like NTR (me neither) but miss this gem of game just bc the 000000.01% of content that have NTR (is just text-based sex anyway) you are quite overreacting, no offense.
Imagine there's a steak house. A really good one. Classy. With what everyone for miles around agrees are the best steaks they've ever had. Good service. Not too expensive. But there's this guy. He refuses to go there. Not only that... he want to make sure other people know he refuses to go there. He likes to show up in the parking lot and tell random people just ariving for a steak dinner how he refuses to eat there. Why? Cause he heard they over cooked a steak once or twice. Out of hundreds of steaks served every week and thousands every month... he has happened to hear about two burned steaks. And that just means this steak house just isn't for him. Not only that... but he wants to make sure people who like the steakhouse know how very objectionable he finds even the rarest case of an over cooked steak. Cause if he ate there sooner of later life would happen to him too and his steak would come out a bit over cooked. And that would just run the whole experience utterly and and his whole evening would be ruined... just absolutely RUINED. And can you blame him? Not everyone is going to want the rare hassle of sending a steak back for them to cook another one. Who could blame him? Better to just never eat there at all. And also to go out of your way to tell strangers that you wont eat there and why.Why are you trying to convince him to play a game that has content he's not interested in?
At least for the role of Succubi, Simon has a "whorem" let's call it. He doesn't give a fuck if they sleep around from time to time and it's usually not trying to convey the feeling of ntr. But not everyone's going to want that and I don't blame him.
First, that's a hell of a wall of text there. Don't agree with the analogy. You could've just said you didn't like how the user commented that the game wasn't for him instead of just leaving and that you felt we should all agree his viewpoint wasn't valid.snip
I simply do not like such content and it ruins it for me. Im not comming here for fights or whatever.Imagine there's a steak house. A really good one. Classy. With what everyone for miles around agrees are the best steaks they've ever had. Good service. Not too expensive. But there's this guy. He refuses to go there. Not only that... he want to make sure other people know he refuses to go there. He likes to show up in the parking lot and tell random people just ariving for a steak dinner how he refuses to eat there. Why? Cause he heard they over cooked a steak once or twice. Out of hundreds of steaks served every week and thousands every month... he has happened to hear about two burned steaks. And that just means this steak house just isn't for him. Not only that... but he wants to make sure people who like the steakhouse know how very objectionable he finds even the rarest case of an over cooked steak. Cause if he ate there sooner of later life would happen to him too and his steak would come out a bit over cooked. And that would just run the whole experience utterly and and his whole evening would be ruined... just absolutely RUINED. And can you blame him? Not everyone is going to want the rare hassle of sending a steak back for them to cook another one. Who could blame him? Better to just never eat there at all. And also to go out of your way to tell strangers that you wont eat there and why.
Forgive me... but I'm having a hard time seeing any of that as normal behavior. Someone who is content in their preferences doesn't come to a forum thread full of fans of a game to passive-aggressively hint about how utterly unacceptable it is that people might be exposed to the minor inconvenience of holding the PGDN key for two seconds to skip a scene they don't like. That's what someone does when they desperately want validation of a viewpoint they damn well know isn't valid.
If you're not hired by that steakhouse to do marketing, why do you even care?Imagine there's a steak house. A really good one. Classy. With what everyone for miles around agrees are the best steaks they've ever had. Good service. Not too expensive. But there's this guy. He refuses to go there. Not only that... he want to make sure other people know he refuses to go there. He likes to show up in the parking lot and tell random people just ariving for a steak dinner how he refuses to eat there. Why? Cause he heard they over cooked a steak once or twice. Out of hundreds of steaks served every week and thousands every month... he has happened to hear about two burned steaks. And that just means this steak house just isn't for him. Not only that... but he wants to make sure people who like the steakhouse know how very objectionable he finds even the rarest case of an over cooked steak. Cause if he ate there sooner of later life would happen to him too and his steak would come out a bit over cooked. And that would just run the whole experience utterly and and his whole evening would be ruined... just absolutely RUINED. And can you blame him? Not everyone is going to want the rare hassle of sending a steak back for them to cook another one. Who could blame him? Better to just never eat there at all. And also to go out of your way to tell strangers that you wont eat there and why.
Forgive me... but I'm having a hard time seeing any of that as normal behavior. Someone who is content in their preferences doesn't come to a forum thread full of fans of a game to passive-aggressively hint about how utterly unacceptable it is that people might be exposed to the minor inconvenience of holding the PGDN key for two seconds to skip a scene they don't like. That's what someone does when they desperately want validation of a viewpoint they damn well know isn't valid.
because there are five pages and 100 posts this discussion is ongoing.If you're not hired by that steakhouse to do marketing, why do you even care?