Thanks a lot for this! I'll use it to improve the game as much as I can, hahaha. Really, thanks for taking your time and writing it.Whiteleaf Studio
Reactions to 0.01:
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
No problem! And if there's ever anything technical you aren't sure how to do in Renpy, I expect I'd be able to answer that too.Thanks a lot for this! I'll use it to improve the game as much as I can, hahaha. Really, thanks for taking your time and writing it.
A few years. I don't drop games, unless me or my artist dies.Looks good, lets see how long it last.
Only sort of true. With more distant connections like cousin, you have to inbreed over a few generations to get a real risk of something congenital. But that risk is higher in closer relations like brother-sister or parent-child. The issue isn't that close relationships spontaneously create mutations, it's the risk that a genetic fault passed on by one parent can't be corrected by a gene from the other parent because they have the same issue. So even if it's the first generation of family lovin', there's an elevated risk compared to a normal relationship. Not unreasonable to be concerned about that if you found out your partner is your half-brother.that triggered me a bit, the topic about incest.. inbreeding mutations doesnt really happen for like 100 years down the line of inbreeding (about 5-6 generations)... the reason incest is a taboo points is because of grooming, not genetics... sadly misinformation on the web is a thing and the whole mutaiton debacle is blown out of proportions...
Like i saw someone on twitter freak out that her dna test showed that she and her fiancee was both children of the same sperm donor.. like it doesnt matter.. gromming is not involved there.
But other then that pet peeve of mine.. i do like the way the story is written here.. i am getting a better vibe from it then your previous work, and are exited for where you take the story
the risk for 2 siblings offspring be hit by some mutation is like under 1% higher then normal non-incest relation. and it kinda pales in comparison to the numbers of % chance you dont give birth to a healthy child because of things like autoimmune disease or some other invalid condition. But either way.. the point is, the general publics misconception is like they think this number is like 90% or something -.-Only sort of true. With more distant connections like cousin, you have to inbreed over a few generations to get a real risk of something congenital. But that risk is higher in closer relations like brother-sister or parent-child. The issue isn't that close relationships spontaneously create mutations, it's the risk that a genetic fault passed on by one parent can't be corrected by a gene from the other parent because they have the same issue. So even if it's the first generation of family lovin', there's an elevated risk compared to a normal relationship. Not unreasonable to be concerned about that if you found out your partner is your half-brother.
So far as I can tell, the excess risk for the offspring of a cousin-cousin pairing is already more than 1%. I have to assume the risk for two siblings is higher than that.the risk for 2 siblings offspring be hit by some mutation is like under 1% higher then normal non-incest relation. and it kinda pales in comparison to the numbers of % chance you dont give birth to a healthy child because of things like autoimmune disease or some other invalid condition. But either way.. the point is, the general publics misconception is like they think this number is like 90% or something -.-