Cake3Purple6Cheese948
Active Member
- Mar 9, 2023
- 514
- 155
- 166
HTML The Repurposing Center [v0.5.24a Public] [Jpmaggers]
Jpmaggers
Member
- Nov 17, 2017
- 312
- 617
- 278
Hi again Cake ^_^
Good catch, I'll do my best to get it sorted. Thank you for the help
Hello goldenskyviper ^_^
Sadly, the slave dungeon is not fully implemented in the game yet.
There have been some delays while I've been getting the avatar image system ready, which will be linked up to it. Slave catching and training is a high priority area of content, that I'm excited to finally get around to.
I was kinda curious about this so Imma check it out. I tried going through this thread to see what the game contains and ngl, had it not moved away from being primarily all about the diaper stuff and whatnot I would've thought this was an ABDL game with how often earlier updates focused so much on it. And I am not into that stuff in the slightest (I like DDlb/DDlg but I do not like when it has actual ageplay stuff, they can be seperate, hence the personal turnoff.)
It seems fine so far, kinda cumbersome in text tho I saw that the dev of this is a fan of erotic novel sort of stuff? At least something like that was mentioned when I skimmed here, so ig it makes sense that that leaked into the text count, there's a lot of text, so I have to get back into the habit of really reading. Tho rn I barely come across sexy stuff as it seems like m/m content is, like many games, sorely neglected for the prioritization of the femmes. I prefer playing as a guy (preferably a femboy if I am able to, and preferably gay if I'm able to) as opposed to my own gender in these sorts of games and although I am bi I am typically drawn towards male characters bc of how neglected they can be in porn game titles, so it does suck that extends here and hasn't really changed despite supposedly being planned, maybe it would solve the issue if the dev sorta "locked in" on that? Like we can't even fuck the One Named Guy who is datable who low and behold, is fucking straight. So people who play male characters but don't really care for romancing femmes (I don't die over it and characters are allowed to have prefs even in games like these, but like come on bruh.. it bothers me bc it's the ONE TOKEN DATABLE GUY) are SoL.
Also as someone who is into petplay content, I saw that it was intending on getting a revamp, I haven't tried it just yet bc I only just started trying this but it was my intention sometime after I get the femme trainer stuff through to see how that goes (I don't care for "sissies" at all, I'm doing it for the ol' made into a femboy roleplay idea), but when I looked at the details, I saw that the general male trainer you have for it will turn into two binary gender trainers, which I wouldn't be bugged by if not for the fact that the type of petplay you want content for is planned to be gender-locked, with the male trainer doing hardcore stuff while the female one is the gentle pet stuff....
.. So apparently if I want to do petplay content with a male trainer once this revamp comes, am I seriously gonna be forced into hardcore content I didn't ask for JUST bc I want a male trainer for that area? Why can't I choose between that, like have a gentle male petplay trainer? Why does the intensity of it need to be gender-locked? I don't get that part of the planned stuff I heard of it at all. I don't really like hardcore petplay, the cuddlier stuff appeals to me, so that is very frustrating to hear be in the backlog. I do not want to do ABDL stuff if I want a damn male trainer (which I heard was planned on being added there.) x.x
It seems fine so far, kinda cumbersome in text tho I saw that the dev of this is a fan of erotic novel sort of stuff? At least something like that was mentioned when I skimmed here, so ig it makes sense that that leaked into the text count, there's a lot of text, so I have to get back into the habit of really reading. Tho rn I barely come across sexy stuff as it seems like m/m content is, like many games, sorely neglected for the prioritization of the femmes. I prefer playing as a guy (preferably a femboy if I am able to, and preferably gay if I'm able to) as opposed to my own gender in these sorts of games and although I am bi I am typically drawn towards male characters bc of how neglected they can be in porn game titles, so it does suck that extends here and hasn't really changed despite supposedly being planned, maybe it would solve the issue if the dev sorta "locked in" on that? Like we can't even fuck the One Named Guy who is datable who low and behold, is fucking straight. So people who play male characters but don't really care for romancing femmes (I don't die over it and characters are allowed to have prefs even in games like these, but like come on bruh.. it bothers me bc it's the ONE TOKEN DATABLE GUY) are SoL.
Also as someone who is into petplay content, I saw that it was intending on getting a revamp, I haven't tried it just yet bc I only just started trying this but it was my intention sometime after I get the femme trainer stuff through to see how that goes (I don't care for "sissies" at all, I'm doing it for the ol' made into a femboy roleplay idea), but when I looked at the details, I saw that the general male trainer you have for it will turn into two binary gender trainers, which I wouldn't be bugged by if not for the fact that the type of petplay you want content for is planned to be gender-locked, with the male trainer doing hardcore stuff while the female one is the gentle pet stuff....
.. So apparently if I want to do petplay content with a male trainer once this revamp comes, am I seriously gonna be forced into hardcore content I didn't ask for JUST bc I want a male trainer for that area? Why can't I choose between that, like have a gentle male petplay trainer? Why does the intensity of it need to be gender-locked? I don't get that part of the planned stuff I heard of it at all. I don't really like hardcore petplay, the cuddlier stuff appeals to me, so that is very frustrating to hear be in the backlog. I do not want to do ABDL stuff if I want a damn male trainer (which I heard was planned on being added there.) x.x
Last edited:
Jpmaggers
Member
- Nov 17, 2017
- 312
- 617
- 278
Hi Gembunny ^_^
There's a lot to respond to here, so I've broken up what you've said into easier to respond to chunks.
When it comes to people talking more about the ABDL content, I think that's just a side effect of player's who like that content being more vocal. The game has never been primarily about diaper content, but was originally about male-to-female transformation, however I got talked into being more broad with the content like 4-5 years back.
On the matter of DDLB/DDLG content, the ABDL Trainer rework is planned to include a DDLB/DDLG path with a male Daddy-Dom character.
I get you on the cumbersome text comment. The plans were always to produce something that was meant to feel like an interactive novel, which leads to very dense text instead of the more cursory text of some other games in the genre. It also tends towards making content take longer to create, and requiring me to offer less options as they all are a bigger undertaking than just a single line change.
M/M content is something I'm happy to add more in (the latest premium build had new M/M femboy content added to Milky's the cum selling store - where you can be 'hand milked' by the fem-boy worker), the situation behind it is just a little complicated. On the one side, originally the game was way more focussed on sex with female characters (and feminization). On the other side, people normally only message me about the female characters (and male characters always lose Patreon/SubscribeStar polls), so the male characters just end up getting far less attention.
When it comes to Davis, that's something I've regretted to be honest. He only has a couple of dates, and he's a very old-content character. When I was originally writing his content the options for the player were more limited, and my ability to create more reactive scenes was less, so I wrote him to only allow female characters to date him. After thinking about it more, I'm really tempted to go back and just change that so he's date-able in general. Will add it to my notes.
P.S. I've really been lax on dating content in general. There is far more planned, but it takes a long time and is very specific content (as in not everyone will be interested). Will try to do better on this in the future.
Sorry to hear about this one. Sadly, this falls into the earlier point about complex content taking a long time to write, and me having to make some compromises when doing so.
People have come to me a lot on wanting different things from Pet-Play training content. Along with the complaining about the gender of the Pet-Play Trainer, I get complaints on how lax/controlling the Trainer should be, and how cuddly/stern they should, how hardcore/not they should be. So my best option in my planning has been to separate out two distinct paths, one for players who want something more hardcore and strict (though he's still very pleasant and friendly), and one for those who want something more cuddly. As the existing content that is more hardcore/strict is with the male Trainer and I don't want to rewrite all of those scenes from scratch, it's the female Trainer who gets the new content path.
The problem with what you're asking is that it's just not feasible for me as a one-man developer (especially with having lost 6+ months of development from health issues this year):
- A typical scene for the Trainer content as is takes me about 1-1.5 work days to write, as there is some complex code, I have to contend with genitals and pronoun calls, and compensate for chastity and clothing/underwear alterations to the scene.
- A scene for content where I have an NPC with variable gender/personality takes about 4-5 work days to write, as I'm writing about 3+ scenes in total (especially if it's sex related) with constant coding to compensate for it.
When I output only 2 scenes in a build because they're complex like that, I get complaints, it stresses me out, and I get burn-out.
Always just doing the best I can.
Jpmaggers
Member
- Nov 17, 2017
- 312
- 617
- 278
Hi Anon ^_^
Just checked and the wiki is up and working at the moment. Checking my emails there were some auto updates last night, so maybe you were unlucky when you tried to access it?