Still doesn't change the fact that I think the updates should be more content filled and with longer wait times rather than just dripfeed slop with barely any content to last 10 minutes.
I don't think it's too much of an ask to get actual updates rather that just going from .1 to .2 on the update cycle rather than it going from 1 to 2 then 3 with more content inbetween, I never said I wasn't fine with waiting, just that the content added in every update is so unsubstantial that it drives people away from actually playing the game.
Here I must give you some reason, the truth is that after such a long waiting period between updates one would expect more content, but as it almost always happens things IRL of the dev prevent you can devote time to the game (in this case his move).
But honestly I don't know how effective would be such a long development period ,same example, to go from 1.0 directly to 2.0, that could take a time of 3 months (maybe more, I'm not sure, I guess it's the disadvantage of depending on the artists, that many times they are usually late with the delivery dates because of things IRL)
I don't know if you locate Inatari Tales, the creator of The Corruption of the Valley, but he usually updates his game every two/three months (almost always two) brings story content and 5-6 scenes (almost always for the main girls) but it's an update model that's a rollercoaster for obvious reasons.
But still, I personally am all for devs taking the time to develop and bring out a better product to something that in the opinion of many may feel incomplete.
I think what I'll do is the following, I'm going to let a couple of updates (maybe 4 or 5) accumulate before playing again, this game interests me a lot (especially Bea) so it partly pisses me off a bit when it reached the end of each update hahaha.