How about they actually finish main story first and then eventually start adding divergence from the show. Some people seems to be mad that this game strictly follows shows plot and votes
Ren'Py Total Degeneracy Island [v0.06x] [SID Gaming]
- Thread starter SID Gaming
- Start date
Game really needs some music or background noise.
The Black Cat
Well-Known Member
- Sep 8, 2023
- 1,908
- 21,863
- 646
IICinderII
New Member
- Mar 17, 2020
- 8
- 17
- 102
Right-click, save page as, and make sure it ends in .rpy and not .txt
Stone_Edge29
Member
- Jun 10, 2022
- 103
- 156
- 166
Mine is like that, on the game files, but still didn't work, am i doing something wrong? how exactly i run the "fix()'?
Чтобы разблокировать 2 предпоследние сцены с Линдси ,нужно не соглашаться на союз или подчинять Хезер.И проявлять знаки внимания к Линдси
It would be as much as a divergence from the show as unlocking Gwen/Heather scenes based on the alliance with Heather. My point was that currently the game has 3 paths: Killer Bass, Screaming Gophers A, and Screaming Gophers B. It kinda feels like besides scenes, the game is quite a bit more fleshed out in the Gopher side than on the Bass side (another example is that our actions lead to one of the islanders hating us, namely Cody).
stopdropnroll
Newbie
- Feb 23, 2020
- 28
- 45
- 111
I didn't want to go deep into detail on my suggestions for the game in my review, so this is a continuation of my proposal for improvement.
The dialogue in free roam drastically needs additional lines from the characters. This is an easy addition to make and would serve as a way to feel more immersed in the atmosphere. For instance, simply change the way the characters respond based on their relationship with you. If you ask someone what their favorite sex position is and they hate your guts, then their response should be rude or dismissive versus if they were really crushing on you and respond in a flirty, eager manner.
This kind of dynamic dialogue system would add significant replay value and make player choices feel meaningful. Imagine asking Heather the same question when she's at low affection versus high affection—the contrast between a cutting insult and sultry teasing would reinforce that your interactions actually matter. The same principle applies to every character: Duncan's aggressive brush-offs turning into a friendly bro comment, Gwen's sarcastic deflections softening into genuine openness, or Lindsay's confused responses becoming enthusiastically lewd.
The beauty of this approach is that it doesn't require new storylines or branching paths—just contextual dialogue variants tied to existing relationship meters. Even three tiers (negative, neutral, positive) per character would dramatically enhance immersion. Right now, static responses make the world feel lifeless, like talking to cardboard cutouts instead of the vibrant personalities Total Drama is known for. Relationship-reactive dialogue transforms free roam from a chore into an actual reason to explore and interact between story beats.
Hopefully, the developer reads this and understands what I am trying to say. Regardless, good luck homie!
The dialogue in free roam drastically needs additional lines from the characters. This is an easy addition to make and would serve as a way to feel more immersed in the atmosphere. For instance, simply change the way the characters respond based on their relationship with you. If you ask someone what their favorite sex position is and they hate your guts, then their response should be rude or dismissive versus if they were really crushing on you and respond in a flirty, eager manner.
This kind of dynamic dialogue system would add significant replay value and make player choices feel meaningful. Imagine asking Heather the same question when she's at low affection versus high affection—the contrast between a cutting insult and sultry teasing would reinforce that your interactions actually matter. The same principle applies to every character: Duncan's aggressive brush-offs turning into a friendly bro comment, Gwen's sarcastic deflections softening into genuine openness, or Lindsay's confused responses becoming enthusiastically lewd.
The beauty of this approach is that it doesn't require new storylines or branching paths—just contextual dialogue variants tied to existing relationship meters. Even three tiers (negative, neutral, positive) per character would dramatically enhance immersion. Right now, static responses make the world feel lifeless, like talking to cardboard cutouts instead of the vibrant personalities Total Drama is known for. Relationship-reactive dialogue transforms free roam from a chore into an actual reason to explore and interact between story beats.
Hopefully, the developer reads this and understands what I am trying to say. Regardless, good luck homie!
From memory, Beth is still 3 or 4 eliminations away from being out. Eva and Izzy both return to the competition at a later point, one very briefly. And I think Leshawna made it to the final 5, so she'll be around a while.
I'm surprised the team never made use of the communal showers, even for just a peeping mini-CG or something. Maybe a keyhole spy thing where you move your cursor around to get the full view of whoever is in there.
stopdropnroll
Newbie
- Feb 23, 2020
- 28
- 45
- 111