Yes, that's right, it's destructive to the artist industry, which is why I don't vote for replacing artists with AI. As much as I would like AI, it is unlikely to reach the level of humans anytime soon simply because humans contain too much information for any AI systems to accommodate. And rather the problem is not that it copies images, there is no theoretical (only theoretical) problem in explaining to AI the structure of the body and making it draw the correct body, but that there is too much such information.
But I'm rather talking about artists using AI for their creations. I sometimes see artists using it to set the basic things for a picture and then fixing it. Yeah, I don't mean Bo using full generation and only then fixing it, because that's not what I mean. Some sort of generative fill, to be more specific. That is, I'm envisioning a scenario where AI will do the dirty work, allowing humans to do the more accurate one, speeding up their work (as any existing machine was designed to do, though - just for rough or monotonous work)