I really think you should've posted this on the review Tab tough, lol.
Well no one was making reviews and this is not an official game thread but a request thread. Plus I've had my reviews deleted before just because I was critical of a game and it was reported and the mod decided to banish my lengthy review to the shadow realm without being able to repeal/ edit my review to "fit" the mod's standards (it was mentioning another game in the review that got me, which is technically part of the rules but is selectively enforced (most reviews are utter trash and is not even up to the word count in the review guidelines yet do not get removed since they do not get reported). What is bothersome to review is if the mod decided your review violated the guidelines then the review is gone (which is not the end of the world) but the inability to make another review. So essentially the review gets yeeted, and the user is unable to create a better review thus wasting the time reviewing the game.
Putting the reviews in the comments still technically count as discussion regarding the game thus the mod can't arbitrarily yeet the comment to oblivion unless it obviously violates certain guidelines (which are less strict compared to reviewing the game).
2 of the reviews I did (from long periods of times, so for example one was x years ago, while another review was y years ago). Got yeeted due to being critical of the game (yet the reason for removal was technicality on the rules guidelines). So while technically those reviews have "violated" the review guidelines, that guidelines are selectively enforced and are usually only for the negative comments that "brings" down the score of games.
I stand by the belief that every proper review is "valid" in a way, both negative and positive since people find different things more favorable/ dislikeable based on their proclivities. There are also reviews that are "bots", some easy to spot, others harder to spot. Also there is a degree of "objectivity" in reviews. Some disregard objectivity when writing reviews while others try to put their utmost in making their reviews as objective as they can possibly make it. Also others can find something positive in what others find negative (for example some coomers would rate gameplay heavy, porn lacking games as "bad", while other people would find more gameplay but fewer H scenes as a better to H games in general since H games are full of nukiges/ quick fap games). I try to be as objective in my reviews as possible but I also accept that other reviews are also valid even if their points may contradict mine. It's up to the person reading reviews which review is more likely to resonate with themselves.
Many "good games" (in my opinion) get almost no reviews/ bad reviews, while many slop games that I also deem as not made with quality are filled with thousands of High reviews. All of those are valid since those people prefer those types of games and I prefer different kind of games compared to them.