Tads [VAM] Look-A-Pedia

5.00 star(s) 1 Vote

JoeEveryPerson

New Member
Feb 25, 2024
11
16
13
As Well, I updated the Pedia with a bunch of Wrestling lookalikes that aren't super obvious or if you are too lazy to do a google search.

There are a few more from Testitou but they seem to be DMCA'd off of the Hub
 
  • Like
Reactions: PRES1DENT

shiyota

Formerly 'master_daddy'
May 18, 2018
16
8
54
OK, will do it your way if you're willing to hand a list of proposed changes. The hardest thing for me was to research internet thots I never cared about, and decide if they are NSFW enough or not.

Categorizing them is better than dumping them into 1 Real, of course, and If someone is willing to hand a ready list, then I'll change the code and then just filter the "This Looks Like" column by what you propose, select all and paste new value and replace, GG EZ.

Just let me know if the above categories are ok for you, the 2xSFW and 2xNSFW, or if you have a better idea.

And, of course, if you don't have the time to write propositions and only made an improvement suggestion, that's fine too, I get that there are better priorities in life than VAM.
Okay based on a cursory runthrough, the I'd personally categorize the following as "Influencers" aka SFW internet celebrities. I'd say 3 categories, Celebrity, NSFW content creator, and SFW internet celeb/Influencer are sufficient.


Abigail Shapiro
Addison Rae
Alanah Pearce
Alexandra Botez
Alexis Ren
Andrea Botez
Angelina Danilova
Bella Poarch
Bhad Bhabie
Brooke Monk
Candace Owens
Chailee Son
Charli D'Amelio
Cinna
Dasha Taran
Dixie D'Amelio
Dytto
Ella Freya
Emiru
Emma Langevin
ExtraEmily
Gabriela Moura
JenNyan
Karen McDougal
Korol Toma
Kyedae
Lara Trautmann (Lara Loft)
Lean Beef Patty @Leanbeefpatty
Lil Tay
Livvy Dunne aka Olivia Dunne
Lydia Violet
Maya Higa
Naomi Payton
Nicola Cavanis
Paige Spiranac
pasabist aka Sabrina Zada
Pokimane
QuarterJade
Rachel Cook
Sara Jean Underwood
Shirogane-Sama
Sommer Ray
Song Joohee
SSSniperWolf
Sydeon
Valentina Caruso
Valkyrae
Viktoria Odintcova
Wakana Uehara
Zienna Eve
 

PRES1DENT

Active Member
Aug 16, 2023
520
2,322
311
functionaladdict, _lp52_ , sorry to tag, but maybe you want to express your opinion.

Is it worth splitting the Celebrities category in 2: Celebrities and Digital Creators (Influencers, Streamers, IG models)?

So from now on we would have to decide whether a celeb is going in Celebrities, Digital Creators or NSFW Content Creators.

There are 500 unique entries at the moment in the Celebrities category. The proposed digital content creators list from above counts 50, but can grow.
 
  • Like
Reactions: functionaladdict

cancer1111

Member
Jun 10, 2020
102
139
166
PRES1DENT I started collecting lookalikes long before your awesome attempt to catalogue all of them, and at this moment i got about 900 non-duplicate lookalikes (basically, if there is multiple authors for some lookalike, i choose the one i personally think is most realistic and delete the rest). Apart from some obvious actresses, most of them i didn't know before and had to use various clues given around (like Guiom mentioned) either from kemono posts, comments there or on patreon pages, letter permutations in character names, etc. I am also not sold on these, that's why i throw them out there in order to get either confirmation or deny from someone and in return give at least some contribution to your catalogue.

With all that being said, here's my thoughts on question marked ones:
For this one, main clue was "Family sitcom". Apparently, there was one with name "Melissa&Joey" in which this actress played a role. Not sure, since it indeed doesn't look quite like her, but on the other hand early work from this creator is not that good as latter ones so the argument "it doesn't look like her" can't be eliminating one. Other candidates are Melissa Peterman, Melissa Michaelsen and Kelly Stables (Melissa from Two and half men), but those are even less convincing in my opinion.

No argument. Actually, it makes more sense to be the one you suggested.

There is one real picture on relevant kemono post with censored eyes and comment from author that 3 pictures he received are so different that he's not even sure if it's the same person. Therefore, cannot rely solely on "does it look like her?". However, running reverse image search on that one censored picture gives a lot results pointing to one i suggested. My take is that he received her pictures both when she was very young and new older ones, which indeed are very different. But, i can be wrong for sure.

P.S. moved debate here in order to keep Bamair's release thread a bit cleaner.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PRES1DENT

Guiom

Newbie
Feb 10, 2018
25
80
184
For this one, main clue was "Family sitcom". Apparently, there was one with name "Melissa&Joey" in which this actress played a role. Not sure, since it indeed doesn't look quite like her, but on the other hand early work from this creator is not that good as latter ones so the argument "it doesn't look like her" can't be eliminating one. Other candidates are Melissa Peterman, Melissa Michaelsen and Kelly Stables (Melissa from Two and half men), but those are even less convincing in my opinion.
She's named "Merry_Joan" in the , so I'd say it's pretty conclusively Melissa Joan Hart.
I don't understand the Melissa & Joey btw: the actress name is Melissa and the character is actually Melanie??
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: PRES1DENT

PRES1DENT

Active Member
Aug 16, 2023
520
2,322
311
cancer1111, Guiom, I edited the Bamair post and added them to Look-A-Pedia.

Now let me ask you something since you're here, lol.

Have a look at posts #144 and #145 (actual conversation starts at #137) and let me know what you think.

Thanks.
 
Sep 9, 2021
138
219
166
functionaladdict, _lp52_ , sorry to tag, but maybe you want to express your opinion.

Is it worth splitting the Celebrities category in 2: Celebrities and Digital Creators (Influencers, Streamers, IG models)?

So from now on we would have to decide whether a celeb is going in Celebrities, Digital Creators or NSFW Content Creators.

There are 500 unique entries at the moment in the Celebrities category. The proposed digital content creators list from above counts 50, but can grow.
I use the spreadsheet purely to search for a specific person I'm after, so I personally wouldn't notice any difference if the categories were split. The only columns I ever use are the real names and links (which is why I'd put them first, but I understand you choosing not to)

Not sure how most others use the spreadsheet, maybe run a poll?
 
  • Like
Reactions: PRES1DENT

shiyota

Formerly 'master_daddy'
May 18, 2018
16
8
54
I use the spreadsheet purely to search for a specific person I'm after, so I personally wouldn't notice any difference if the categories were split. The only columns I ever use are the real names and links (which is why I'd put them first, but I understand you choosing not to)

Not sure how most others use the spreadsheet, maybe run a poll?
I imagine most people probably do go into the sheet looking for a specific person, but sometimes I like to browse by category just to see what looks have been made without any one particular in mind.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PRES1DENT

cancer1111

Member
Jun 10, 2020
102
139
166
cancer1111, Guiom, I edited the Bamair post and added them to Look-A-Pedia.

Now let me ask you something since you're here, lol.

Have a look at posts #144 and #145 (actual conversation starts at #137) and let me know what you think.

Thanks.
I can see adding categories of any sort can come in handy for future lookapedia visitors who might want to filter thousands of entries to some particular category to, sort of, "shorten the results" in case they are there not to search for some particular name, but more in general "let me see what we have here for category X and what i don't have in my personal collection from that category".

I've actually done something similar to my personal collection using JayJayWon's BrowserAssist and introduced a tag system instead of categories, so they can be filterred by multiple tags at the same time. I just went quite a bit broader, with celebrity/sfw category which i split to actress, musician, influencer (all tik tok/instagram/youtube/twitch creators), glamour model (no full nudity), supermodel (to keep the catwalk cats from the rest of mortals), sports (mainly wwe) and tv hosts, and nsfw category to porn actress and adult model (like playboy models who've done full nudity photosession careers, but not in porn industry). And in that way, i can assign multiple tags to some person which can be, for example, both model and actress at the same time. You got the idea.

However, i don't think you want to do like that mainly because it was very slow and tedious process to assign all of that to every single character. Second, you'll end up with possible mess with tags that are subsets of other tags. For example, "almost all porn actresses are also adult models, although, no adult model is a porn actress at the same time". Similar with glamour->supermodel. Multiple characters ends up with 2, 3 or 4 tags at the same time.

What you proposed is pretty good and more than enough for a catalogue that lookapedia will be.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PRES1DENT

shiyota

Formerly 'master_daddy'
May 18, 2018
16
8
54
I can see adding categories of any sort can come in handy for future lookapedia visitors who might want to filter thousands of entries to some particular category to, sort of, "shorten the results" in case they are there not to search for some particular name, but more in general "let me see what we have here for category X and what i don't have in my personal collection from that category".

I've actually done something similar to my personal collection using JayJayWon's BrowserAssist and introduced a tag system instead of categories, so they can be filterred by multiple tags at the same time. I just went quite a bit broader, with celebrity/sfw category which i split to actress, musician, influencer (all tik tok/instagram/youtube/twitch creators), glamour model (no full nudity), supermodel (to keep the catwalk cats from the rest of mortals), sports (mainly wwe) and tv hosts, and nsfw category to porn actress and adult model (like playboy models who've done full nudity photosession careers, but not in porn industry). And in that way, i can assign multiple tags to some person which can be, for example, both model and actress at the same time. You got the idea.

However, i don't think you want to do like that mainly because it was very slow and tedious process to assign all of that to every single character. Second, you'll end up with possible mess with tags that are subsets of other tags. For example, "almost all porn actresses are also adult models, although, no adult model is a porn actress at the same time". Similar with glamour->supermodel. Multiple characters ends up with 2, 3 or 4 tags at the same time.

What you proposed is pretty good and more than enough for a catalogue that lookapedia will be.
you should see my tags in BA haha it's a mess I have categories for hair color, ethnicity, body type, and so on
 

Guiom

Newbie
Feb 10, 2018
25
80
184
Now let me ask you something since you're here, lol.

Have a look at posts #144 and #145 (actual conversation starts at #137) and let me know what you think.

Thanks.
I'm simply replying because you asked, but I don't know.
An influencer category seems fair to me. Another one that might come up soon is Kpop/Kdrama.
More than this level of detail and it just becomes tags.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PRES1DENT

_lp52_

Newbie
May 20, 2025
24
13
3
I use the spreadsheet purely to search for a specific person I'm after, so I personally wouldn't notice any difference if the categories were split. The only columns I ever use are the real names and links (which is why I'd put them first, but I understand you choosing not to)

Not sure how most others use the spreadsheet, maybe run a poll?
Same for me
 
  • Like
Reactions: PRES1DENT
5.00 star(s) 1 Vote