I'm not trying to be negative, but real. Here are some things that occur to me. This game is quality, it really is. Once I have some more pocket money, I intend to support them, so take my words with a grain of salt because I am not currently paying money for this.
1) If I wasn't worried about them being perfectionists, I am now. The fact that they, on a supposed release day, were ready to change a substantial chunk of the update because of initial feedback sets a tone. I can understand not wanting to release an update with bugs. I can also understand giving some more testing after fixing them in order to make 100% sure it's ready. However, the fact that they aren't prepared to commit to a release is a trend that hopefully won't stay for long.
2) They need to open up testing slightly earlier. I'm sure there are a large number of supporters that wouldn't mind an earlier access to help hunt bugs, and I'm sure even a few could help correct them. It would definitely speed up the editing and bughunting process, which is one of the longer cycles. If this update had a beta cycle like that, this pacing issue may have been spotted earlier and fixed without causing as much of a bump.
3) There needs to be the ability to gently (read: not being jerks about it) criticize the devs. This thread is full of people that do nothing but shout down anyone who questions anything, because the devs are more transparent than most. I think it's healthy to not put people in a bubble where they cannot hear any dissenting voices because people think they're fragile. That said, people also need to be using actual criticism and not comparing the dev to ICSTOR, which they definitely are not.
All in all, I look forward to the update and hope that the next one runs into fewer stumbling blocks.
1) If I wasn't worried about them being perfectionists, I am now. The fact that they, on a supposed release day, were ready to change a substantial chunk of the update because of initial feedback sets a tone. I can understand not wanting to release an update with bugs. I can also understand giving some more testing after fixing them in order to make 100% sure it's ready. However, the fact that they aren't prepared to commit to a release is a trend that hopefully won't stay for long.
2) They need to open up testing slightly earlier. I'm sure there are a large number of supporters that wouldn't mind an earlier access to help hunt bugs, and I'm sure even a few could help correct them. It would definitely speed up the editing and bughunting process, which is one of the longer cycles. If this update had a beta cycle like that, this pacing issue may have been spotted earlier and fixed without causing as much of a bump.
3) There needs to be the ability to gently (read: not being jerks about it) criticize the devs. This thread is full of people that do nothing but shout down anyone who questions anything, because the devs are more transparent than most. I think it's healthy to not put people in a bubble where they cannot hear any dissenting voices because people think they're fragile. That said, people also need to be using actual criticism and not comparing the dev to ICSTOR, which they definitely are not.
All in all, I look forward to the update and hope that the next one runs into fewer stumbling blocks.