If we are lucky, maybe in September/October. However, I'm afraid that the more likely option is October/November.
Ren'Py What a Legend! [v0.7.03] [MagicNuts]
- Thread starter magicnuts
- Start date
-
- Tags
- 2dcg adventure anal sex animated big ass big tits cheating creampie exhibitionism fantasy groping group sex handjob harem humor male protagonist masturbation milf mobile game monster girl oral sex paranormal point & click romance sandbox sex toys spanking teasing titfuck transformation vaginal sex voyeurism
- Oct 21, 2020
- 81
- 77
- May 6, 2020
- 413
- 1,419
Seeing as how she's the main focus of the next update because she won the Patreon poll, you're either not crazy or you're one of many crazies.
- Jan 27, 2022
- 286
- 281
hope that the next update has a completed storyline since its been almost a year since the game got updated.
this game's surprisingly fun, i installed it for a quick fap and stayed for the story.
this game's surprisingly fun, i installed it for a quick fap and stayed for the story.
I can guarantee that's not going to happen. The main story may be advanced slightly, but the update focuses on a specific LI.
Ahh, good to see the progress has been steady, though at least another 2-3 months to cook still. Each update is the length of most game's posted on F95, so no complaints here. When it's done, always worth the wait.
- May 24, 2019
- 1,600
- 2,636
Whenever i see an interesting game, i look at two things:
1. The date the thread was started.
2. Last update date & changelog.
Judging from what im seeing here, this game started out strong with a lot of updates, but slowed down to a crawl in the last two years or so. How close am i on this one?
1. The date the thread was started.
2. Last update date & changelog.
Judging from what im seeing here, this game started out strong with a lot of updates, but slowed down to a crawl in the last two years or so. How close am i on this one?
A bit, but what you are leaving out is that they asked their supporters what they liked more, short/fast updates, or longer/slower updates that contain a more complete story arc. Their supporters voted for the longer updates. Add to that the fact that they had a kid last December (and obviously she was pregnant for a while before that), which is also slowing things down more than usual.
- Jun 17, 2019
- 4,338
- 14,407
You'd be both right and wrong. It got updated more often at the beginning, in part because there was some buffered content when they first released it, but mainly because after 0.3 their patrons voted for longer and conclusive updates. So the development cycle is now longer but we get way more content each update than during the first year. Plus this update has been slowed down due to real life reasons like having a baby
Putting the glasses down would actually be the opposite of "leave the old hag out of it" Freudian slip?
- Dec 12, 2017
- 51
- 115
Now this is news to me. I knew about the long cycle but was wondering why this one took a lot longer than the others.
Yeah, she was working up until she popped, and has had to take things kind of easy early this year. And of course, each update has more stuff, more complex ideas, and more work over all. That is the thing about this kind of work, the more you do, the more you learn that you can do, and the more you want to do... XD
Pistachio was also hospitalized for a bit with some medical issues in his leg, so it's been a rough dev cycle for both of them.
Yeah.. Patreon game devs have a weird tendency to suffer health issues after they start making a living off it.
- Jan 3, 2018
- 4,915
- 10,324
They've had their Patreon up for over 3 years, so they "started making a living off it" quite some time ago.
Not sure how you qualify "giving birth" as a simple "health issue".
It's far more than "health", it's ongoing added responsibility for the life of something which cannot take care of itself.
I think that (alone) is a pretty justifiable reason for it taking longer.
Seems as though you're making the same mistake that has been made multiple times, in this thread.
Applying the bad experiences\behaviours you've seen with other devs, to this dev.
Yet there is no valid reason, or justification to do so.
Last edited: