Im not defending it, I dont like all the shota/loli stuff, but theres games in this forum with Rape(sometimes with extreme violence) , Beastiality even Necrophilia and no one says shit but when it comes to Underage looking characters ppl flip out.
I dont get it F95, what kind of priorities are this.
The reasoning behind rule 7 was to keep anything involving children out because it attracts a certain type of person they didn't want.
However it's the single most inconsistently moderated rule on the site to the point where it serves no purpose.
Some games with blatantly underage models still stay around while some are removed. I guess it depends on which mod sees it because there are some that fall so far under rule 7 yet were cleared like Urban Demons while others that barely see a loli's nipple are removed.
Not my kink so the rule doesn't bother me but it would be nice if the rule was universal and not based on how a mod feels on any given day.
To be fair I don't understand why it's still a thing. It's not doing the job they intended it to do and the mods don't enforce it across the board it's just a waste of time.
Personally it looks to me like they flip a coin whenever they find a game falling under that rule and the coin toss decides if it stays or goes because it's random as fuck.
