guys, i found this guide to choose which linux distro would be better. how true is it?
View attachment 4958323
Probably a lot of info dump for the beginner in this graphic and all in all it's the wrong approach "distro hopping" is a common thing and even linux veterans still use multiple boot and test others out or have an OS for gaming/work etc. Be careful with Bias especially against Ubnuntu, there are always some fanboys and hater (especially Arch vs Ubuntu). Ubuntu and their derivates are good for starters but Ubuntu is widely supported but i'm not a fan of their development feels fairly windowish (all control by them, only following their own thing and pushing it a lot especially with their package manager snap even against audience wishes). Things you should keep in mind you should deactivate (super) fast boot and secure boot in bios, only makes starting worse, if you still keep to plan using Windows and you need to reformat your disk install Windows first and than Linux otherwise Windows just fucks your UEFI up and need some tinkering to fix dual boot after it. Don't use full disk encryption for dual boot it make things very complicated and you shouldn't use bitlocker (if you keep windows). I wouldn't recommend distributions like Fedora (to short development cycle with very experimental software and you shouldn't use Arch causeit's for experienced users). Good for starts are Ubuntu Derivates (Zorin can be very outdated has good windows integration from start, many use Mint (im not a fan) and I would probably opt for "KDE Neon" or Kubuntu (what can be a bit to close to Ubuntu) as starter. Be aware it's not only about the OS, there is a desktop environment as very important aprt as well for the desktop design, supported applications, resourceallocation.
KDE my favorite very customable but not for old software (looks in default very like Windows). You can design it like you want.
Gnome is more for a mac-look and is similiar fressource-wise to KDE
Xfce is design-wise like an older windows with less ressource-heavy
Budgie i realy enjoy it design-wise but more a niche and not everywhere supported.
And for the long run i would probably opt. for Garuda (it has a good installer with recommanded software where you can pick for every use case the software you like and as starter you probably don't know all options and so you have a great overview what's out there) or Cachy OS both are good for gaming but can be Ressource-hungry and sometimes a few things can break especially if you don't update at least weekly. I'm using Garuda in the Mokka flavor as main OS right now cause it's not as experimental like Arch, comes with everything you need, not as barebone with some Designs to pick and not just the default from KDE. But be aware they are Arch derivates and so not always 100% stable, if you want to test Arch-like you should probably start with Manjaro cause it's a bit more behind from development cycle with always stable releases.