Why so defensive over an unemotional comment? must you project insecure emotions onto a comment that doesn't have them?
Dev says they don't like NTR, and then shoe-horns it in (and actions speak louder than words), but doesn't give CGs... this only serves to piss everyone off... like who wins?
NTR-fans: Get no CGs in a CG game, when they pick the option they like.
NTR-haters: have NTR in a game from a dev that "doesn't like" NTR.
"You have to both lose and pick the bad option" makes it even worse.... like that is going out of their way to include NTR in the game
could just not have that option if they "don't like" NTR. (and no CGs for those that would pick it either).
Remove the NTR context if you need to do so, and look at it as "X" instead, and it will still be just as dumb.
Like imagine in a NTR game, where the dev adds in a harem scene... that is purely optional, and you have to go out of your way to get to it, but no CG... and the dev doesn't like harem.
See how dumb that sounds?
Hopefully that is explained enough for you to understand the original point. Has nothing to do with how easy the NTR is to avoid or the fact it is NTR really, and everything to do with the hypocrisy of saying "I don't like X" but then goes out of their way to include X, just with no CGs, to the benefit of basically no one.