- Jul 28, 2018
- 106
- 318
I don't think that law you're mentioning is truly in order. Since their only point to say AI art is not copyrightable is because is "made by a machine", which is MAJOR BS BONKERS. Using this same logic, Photographic art could NOT have copyright and IT DOES, so...I'm sure there are ways. Like I said, I'm not an expert on the topic nor I know the science behind it. I was just suggesting to modify the pieces in order for them to get protected instead of using them raw. Your example probably works.
And still, as someone mentioned before, how the hell can you know if a piece of art is AI or not, or what about if It's 50-50%? There's no fucking way no one can know, so basically anyone trying to claim property over others art, may find themselves in an ugly situation here...