- Apr 22, 2019
- 2,220
- 1,935
There exists at least one life saver type and it is an ambulance. This does not limit all life savers to ambulances; that would require all life savers be ambulances which is not a premise provided. Or as Monty Python put it: " Universal affirmatives can only be partially converted: all of Alma Cogan is dead, but only some of the class of dead people are Alma Cogan. "
No ambulance is a bumper car. Therefore bumper cars are not that type of life saver. So at least some life savers are not bumper cars.
Bumper cars might belong to a different class of life saver we simply don't know -- we only are told of one but the description does not make it the only one.
Last edited:
- Apr 29, 2018
- 1,167
- 1,287
Oh, that's not the dream's fault, that's just how a course/club on formal logic is. The main trick here is to ignore any associations with the words and just treat them as generic variables.
- Jun 26, 2018
- 8,617
- 12,023
I don't remember any of these puzzles and I think I did all the main and sub quests for each LI. When does this happen?
What happened to the old rapey dream with Lyriel? Dream ends now before getting to fuck her if you go that route, whereas before you absolutely could.
Anyway to get an older version of the game?
Anyway to get an older version of the game?
Last edited:
I think i deleted the first, sorry about that. combining the 2 remaining.All ambulances are life savers. = Some lifesavers are not bumper cars. This is an absolute fact. Hence it's the correct answer, by deductive reasoning.
No ambulances are bumper cars. = Self explanatory.
It does not state that "No lifesavers are bumper cars", which is why that answer is incorrect. It's an assumption, not a given fact.
Please use "Edit" and combine your 3 consecutive posts, to one.
- Jan 3, 2018
- 4,915
- 10,324
Nice one, thanks.
OK, with regards the dream, do you mean the one where she's in the stocks & you can take advantage of her?
I don't think it's been changed, but I can't check because I didn't take the rapey option. I have a feeling that was a BJ.
There might be an older version posted in the thread, but there isn't one available from the OP, only the latest version.
Can I ask, why do you want an older version? Just to check the dream, or something else?
No, I'm referring to the scene where she has her hands tied to the bed. Now if you go down that route it fades out of the dream, and if i load a save mid scene from that it produces an error after clicking once. So the scene itself seems to exist in the files somewhere but it is no longer accessible im guessing for some reason.Nice one, thanks.
OK, with regards the dream, do you mean the one where she's in the stocks & you can take advantage of her?
I don't think it's been changed, but I can't check because I didn't take the rapey option.
There might be an older version posted in the thread, but there isn't one available from the OP, only the latest version.
Can I ask, why do you want an older version? Just to check the dream, or something else?
The only reason I was looking for an older version was for that 1 scene, yeah.
- Apr 29, 2018
- 1,167
- 1,287
Fairly early on, I think it's still just you and Rae in the house, you can have a dream about a dating sim the MC was playing before the events of this game. It's just a one-off sequence with a random anime character and a lewd scene at the end.
- Jun 26, 2018
- 8,617
- 12,023
- Jun 26, 2018
- 8,617
- 12,023
I guess that.
Although I have to say that if dreams aren't mandatory for the story or/and don't happen automatically, I will not have seen them.
- Apr 22, 2019
- 2,220
- 1,935
I would for two reasons: first it tends to remove a whole bunch of potential cases that otherwise need testing or review and second, anyone else who looks at the premises can immediately see if my assumptions hold true in case I misunderstood something.<snip>
If we're talking about practical application: certainly. Although I wouldn't denote it personally because it is irrelevant to everything that follows whether they exist or not. Here we are not talking about something slice of life but a competition in formal logic however, there I don't see them making it too easy by applying common sense - just the bare rules and their consequences. That's why all the attributes are so silly as well. You could take whichone's example of human mortality otherwise, but then real life might give you a hint as to whether or not the answer is feasible - and where's the fun in that?
If I mark "At least one message will exist" and someone else knows there are cases where something happens silently, they can point out my premise is faulty and therefore my conclusions need to be re-examined.
- Jun 26, 2018
- 8,617
- 12,023
- Jun 26, 2018
- 8,617
- 12,023
I still don't remember doing this part of the game... The questions or any minigame don't sound familiar to me.
- Dec 1, 2019
- 8,811
- 14,951
The "illogical process" I'm following is called "formal logic" and works exactly like that. We don't care what your real world thinks about unicorns.
Think again how it all is the same, so that the different combos of unicornness and horsity work out. Your approach would lead to a logical conundrum if unicorns did actually exist. And it must work whether or not they do.
- Aug 4, 2020
- 3,506
- 19,695
Dear ZanithOne, for the love of God, and all things holy, please use x’s, y’s and z’s for all future logical tests!
- Jul 21, 2017
- 1,635
- 2,480
I prefer Guns, Butter, and the Price of Tea in China. oh wait those are logical tests for economics classes ...Dear ZanithOne, for the love of God, and all things holy, please use x’s, y’s and z’s for all future logical tests!
Hello, guys! Can anyone tell me on how to install the current patch? I tried to run it as an .exe but it didn't work.
- Jun 16, 2020
- 354
- 720
I, I really love this elf.