Firstly, this is a good game. It's become a classic on this site and for those interested in its themes, I strongly recommend it.
However, this game also illustrates a small pet peeve I have, and that's the requirement of tags for content that is minimal or practically nonexistent in the game. That's not the fault of this game, but merely a fact of life about how tags are implemented on this site. There's no real gradation or context to the tags; they are purely binary. Either the content is there, or it isn't and what qualifies as 'there' can merely be one scene or littered throughout the whole game.
It makes me wish that we had some way to clarify tags on a game, like a rating of 1-5. So if a game has 'gay' content, for example, but it's only one or two scenes, that'd be "Gay-1" or somesuch, whereas a game that is nothing but say, Furry sex, would have a tag like "Furry-5."
Anyhow, not a complaint about this game. Spell For All is fantastic. Simply an observation on the tag weirdness of F95zone.
However, this game also illustrates a small pet peeve I have, and that's the requirement of tags for content that is minimal or practically nonexistent in the game. That's not the fault of this game, but merely a fact of life about how tags are implemented on this site. There's no real gradation or context to the tags; they are purely binary. Either the content is there, or it isn't and what qualifies as 'there' can merely be one scene or littered throughout the whole game.
It makes me wish that we had some way to clarify tags on a game, like a rating of 1-5. So if a game has 'gay' content, for example, but it's only one or two scenes, that'd be "Gay-1" or somesuch, whereas a game that is nothing but say, Furry sex, would have a tag like "Furry-5."
Anyhow, not a complaint about this game. Spell For All is fantastic. Simply an observation on the tag weirdness of F95zone.