1. making a post is not "bursting into the thread"
2. there is nothing wrong with listing what you do not like about a game
3. you literally can't tell if he was calm or not from reading his text. nonverbal cues are lost when posting text online. As such this is all in your head
4. being calm and stoic have nothing to do with flaming
again, I don't agree with him. But you guys are being ridiculous and just destroying your own credibility.
1) He came literally after he got removed
2) I agree, but that’s where reviews come from.
If you come into the thread for constructive criticism,he wasn’t, he literally sponsored and advised against it
3)You can tell a lot from a user writing, I agree that sometimes it can be misinterpreted but this time it wasn’t the case.
4) Yes it does
Now you are making me laugh.
We are being ridiculous and destroying our credibility, totally, you just destroyed yours.
This conversation ended eons ago, why bringing that up?
He wasn’t here for constructive criticism, do you think a guy who comes into a thread of a game with negative opinions and tries to expose them aggressively is going to receive praise and cookies?
His replies tells a lot, but this argument it was ended by a long time.
Edit: nvm I apologize ignore this shit I made