Jack Adams
Active Member
- Mar 1, 2019
- 553
- 4,610
- 404
What I am about to write is just one man’s perspective floating in a sea of other valid comments. I’m not going to address the slow production rate in this comment. Let’s turn the clock back to 2017…
L&P recognizes that the majority of games (not all) being produced in this genre provide poor graphic depictions of a skeletal story expressed with insipid dialogue by two-dimensional characters (he was correct).
L&P takes time to understand female psychology and temeritously incorporates it into his story… including those aspects that most women don’t want to openly admit. He spends time developing his characters and their back story as a family. He then story-board’s the methodical derogation of his protagonist (this is all commendable).
After producing enough worthwhile renders to entice an audience he releases his first version and goes on to explain that his effort is in response to the dross that is offered in the genre and he will show how an adult VN is done (this is dangerous). I applaud him for the desire and work-ethic to produce and offer his audience a high-quality adult novel. I believe that (in his well-meaning fervor) he misses that there is more than one way to ‘do it’ properly. When his honest efforts are challenged his disbelief leads to over-reaction and does damage with his rebuttal.
I believe that his work has inspired others to effort in new directions by his example. It would serve him well to recognize quality work done a different way for what it is … a vast improvement over the dross that congested this venue in 2017. Commending the achievements of others would lift some of the heat he doesn’t believe he deserves when he is working so hard.
In addition, L&P (although intelligent) does not have the complete skill set. He is a talented graphic artist. He is a capable researcher who understands the nuances and the conceptual connective tissue of what he studies. He is adroit in terms of setting up the long-term steps that lead to a conclusion. However, he severely lacks in logic continuity when it comes to the progressive choices and expression of his characters, and fails on the micro level when it comes to dialogue.
I strongly believe that if he received help in the form of a second set of eyes checking the continuity, and a skilled PR representative his stress would decrease and his product would improve.
L&P recognizes that the majority of games (not all) being produced in this genre provide poor graphic depictions of a skeletal story expressed with insipid dialogue by two-dimensional characters (he was correct).
L&P takes time to understand female psychology and temeritously incorporates it into his story… including those aspects that most women don’t want to openly admit. He spends time developing his characters and their back story as a family. He then story-board’s the methodical derogation of his protagonist (this is all commendable).
After producing enough worthwhile renders to entice an audience he releases his first version and goes on to explain that his effort is in response to the dross that is offered in the genre and he will show how an adult VN is done (this is dangerous). I applaud him for the desire and work-ethic to produce and offer his audience a high-quality adult novel. I believe that (in his well-meaning fervor) he misses that there is more than one way to ‘do it’ properly. When his honest efforts are challenged his disbelief leads to over-reaction and does damage with his rebuttal.
I believe that his work has inspired others to effort in new directions by his example. It would serve him well to recognize quality work done a different way for what it is … a vast improvement over the dross that congested this venue in 2017. Commending the achievements of others would lift some of the heat he doesn’t believe he deserves when he is working so hard.
In addition, L&P (although intelligent) does not have the complete skill set. He is a talented graphic artist. He is a capable researcher who understands the nuances and the conceptual connective tissue of what he studies. He is adroit in terms of setting up the long-term steps that lead to a conclusion. However, he severely lacks in logic continuity when it comes to the progressive choices and expression of his characters, and fails on the micro level when it comes to dialogue.
I strongly believe that if he received help in the form of a second set of eyes checking the continuity, and a skilled PR representative his stress would decrease and his product would improve.