- Apr 21, 2020
- 1,866
- 7,917
Your words in this post are extremely disrespectful to the author of AWAM. You don't decide what is more important to L&P, the details or the promotion of the story.The lessons learned by the comparison, from my perspective, is that L&P needs to stop dwelling on the minutia and move the story forward. 42 pages of script for the events listed is probably going to be so much pretentious bullshit and very little of actual substance.
You absolutize your opinion, do not even admit the idea that there are any other approaches to assessments other than your own.
Damn it, you can't be so blind as not to see and understand that you yourself are what you blame the L&P for.
Create your own project according to the rules that you set L&P or play other games that you like, where the developers are more suited to your requirements. Refuse to use AWAM, but you do not need to impose your own approaches and criteria for evaluating the developer's work.
Just some kind of madness! How do people fail to understand that a linear approach to evaluating efficiency is absolutely inappropriate for the creative process, for creative work!
I have no desire to offend you, but comments like yours personally upset me greatly.